Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Nobody wants to commit military into combat. It's the last option."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 10:22 PM
Original message
"Nobody wants to commit military into combat. It's the last option."
Another day, another lie. This is what Bush said at the "news" conference today. Who actually believes this shit?

It was a war of choice - not necessity. That is the truth. And nobody in the Bush immediate family has died yet. It was his choice.

The last option? Yeah, right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. it's not my fault, weely, I didn't want to but he made me
argh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's still lying, of course
Did anyone really think that when asked about the DSM, he'd admit he had plans to invade Iraq months before going to the UN?

He'll keep lying even while we're kicking his out of the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Why did you put troops into Kuwait before you went to the UN ?
Were they there for vacation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It was worse than that -
Edited on Tue Jun-07-05 10:51 PM by sparosnare
Bombing runs in southern Iraq hoping to provoke an attack so * would have an excuse to invade.

The war started a year before we were told. A year before the media frenzy of "shock and awe". Bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. So I wonder if that comes AFTER nukes?
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. What was particularly galling was his comment about comforting
military families after they've lost a loved one to his War of Lies...
I don't recall his EVER attending a funeral for a fallen soldier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Last option? Really? Just ONE QUESTION...
Then WHY did bush kick the UN weapons inspectors out of Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ummmmmm....
because he knew they wouldn't find anything? :rofl: :spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpetbagger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. He's really saying he thinks war can be fought without troops.
That's his problem as a tactician. That, above everything else, is why we're screwed. I honestly think he's going on some religious vision out of Raiders of the Lost Ark. We could have taken Hussein down, and installed a working government, if Bush had the guts to commit enough troops in the first weeks. Remember, it took about 3-6 months after the fall of Baghdad for the insurgency to get rolling. Before then, we were considered warily, but genuinely nonetheless, as the people who at least took down a dictator.

Exhibit A: Tora Bora/Op. Anaconda. Bush fails to deploy an airborne division into the fight. Bin Laden and his senior leadership escape the siege.

Exhibit B: Drive on Baghdad/Op. Iraqi Freedom. Bush ignores advice from his Army Chief of Staff (who Rumsfeld boots) and his Army secretary (who Rumsfeld boots). They wanted 300-400,000 troops. Bush had how many, about 100,000 in Iraq by April 2003?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC