Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In the NATION: Conyers is said to be considering the option of Impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:10 PM
Original message
In the NATION: Conyers is said to be considering the option of Impeachment
SOURCE: http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20050613&s=scahill
(Emphasis added)

It only takes one member of Congress to begin an impeachment process, and Conyers is said to be considering the option. The process would certainly be revealing. Congress could subpoena Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Gen. Richard Myers, Gen.Tommy Franks and all of the military commanders and pilots involved with the no-fly zone bombings going back into the late 1990s. What were their orders, both given and received? In those answers might lie a case for impeachment.


Yet another question looms, particularly for Democrats who voted for the war and now say they were misled: Why weren't these unprovoked and unauthorized attacks investigated when they were happening, when it might have had a real impact on the Administration's drive to war? Perhaps that's why the growing grassroots campaign to use the Downing Street memo to impeach Bush can't get a hearing on Capitol Hill. A real probing of this "smoking gun" would not be uncomfortable only for Republicans. The truth is that Bush, like President Bill Clinton before him, oversaw the longest sustained bombing campaign since Vietnam against a sovereign country with no international or US mandate. That gun is probably too hot for either party to touch.



The implications of this information for US lawmakers are profound. It was already well known in Washington and international diplomatic circles that the real aim of the US attacks in the no-fly zones was not to protect Shiites and Kurds. But the new disclosures prove that while Congress debated whether to grant Bush the authority to go to war, while Hans Blix had his UN weapons-inspection teams scrutinizing Iraq and while international diplomats scurried to broker an eleventh-hour peace deal, the Bush Administration was already in full combat mode--not just building the dossier of manipulated intelligence, as the Downing Street memo demonstrated, but acting on it by beginning the war itself. And according to the Sunday Times article, the Administration even hoped the attacks would push Saddam into a response that could be used to justify a war the Administration was struggling to sell.


On the eve of the official invasion, on March 8, 2003, Bush said in his national radio address: "We are doing everything we can to avoid war in Iraq. But if Saddam Hussein does not disarm peacefully, he will be disarmed by force." Bush said this after nearly a year of systematic, aggressive bombings of Iraq, during which Iraq was already being disarmed by force, in preparation for the invasion to come. By the Pentagon's own admission, it carried out seventy-eight individual, offensive airstrikes against Iraq in 2002 alone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Keep it coming!
:woohoo: :woohoo:

:patriot:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Impeachment is starting to roll off many a tongue
I think we may be reaching critical mass for this to be considered

Problem is, this is not yet a political optioon, so write to your congress critters (especially the Righties) and put the pressure on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. If they can impeach Clinton for...
A blowjob and lying about it, then someone could definately impeach Bush for all the crap he's caused in this country over the last four years.

I say do it! DO IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #20
43. Really, really, really! No Chit!
Edited on Fri Jun-03-05 12:49 AM by AuntiBush
You said it!

And "impeach bush" Google search tonight resulted in over 483,000:
http://www.google.com/search?q=impeach+bush&btnG=Search&hl=en&lr=

Impeach Bush: http://www.impeachbush.tv/
Vote to Impeach Bush: http://www.vetoimpeach.org/
Impeach Bush: http://zzpat.tripod.com/cvb/
Petition to Impeach Bush: http://www.petitiononline.com/ddc12/petition.html
Discussion for Grounds for impeachment - Impeach Bush: http://www.impeachbush.tv/impeach/

To name but a few... what's this tell us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #43
55. Wonder what would happen?
A media circus distraction is scheduled for Monday starring the inimitable Michael Jackson. Lot's of vans and cameras and microphones and such. Can you imagine the area around the couthouse SWAMPED with angry citizens carrying signs and shouting "IMPEACH!" THAT would be a TOUGH EDIT!!! :evilgrin: Don't mind me, I'm just fantasizing. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. If they bushitler were to nuke San Francisco tomorrow, he
wouldn't be impeached! They own all the machinery, but I still like the idea of the old college try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Sadly
thats a real possibility. A dirty bomb planted somewhere on the West Coast (this time) and blamed on the Iranians. I wouldn't put anything past these mad men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
39. There was a report in AZ local news tonight that an arrest had been
made on an Iranian man for smuggling illegal iranians into AZ...here we go.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MN ChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Go, John, Go!
:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:

Conyers: the last honest man in Washington. I think I have my first true political hero in a looooong time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick & Nominate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Don't Waste Any Time!
IMPEACH NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. Yes, and it's important to get Delay out of his position right away too.
If Delay was gone, a lot of intimidated Republicans would come out of the woodwork. They'd like Bush to go too but Delay's had them by the short hairs. He's the capo or consiglieri. I think he's a linchpin to toppling the whole crime family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Why is DeLay still around??
:shrug: Go Conyers! He's the best. And now Kerry is going to talk about it. Yay! Impeach the whole gang of bastards.

:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meisje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yawn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Yawn, double yawn. No two Repug Representatives would ever
join under any circumstances to impeach any Repug president ever, no matter how compelling the case for impeachment were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. That is why we have to turn the reThugs out in 06. Impeach him now anyway
it takes a while to get started and we can and will have the majority by the time it comes up for the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Hard to turn reThugs out of office with squirrelly electronic voting
machines being controlled by big donors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #25
41. What boggles my mind, is WHY DON'T PEOPLE GET IT??
What part of "they own the vote counting machines" is so hard to understand?

It goes to the root of EVERY problem we are having right now:

War
Torture
Media
Economy
Environment
Global Warming

....every single issue is happening BECAUSE, since 2000, the republicans have been able to manipulate the elections, their buddies OWN the 4 companies that count 80% of the votes in the entire country, and they have taken control of every aspect of the country.

Until State legislatures and County Elections Offices are inundated with VERY angry citizens demanding paper ballots, hand counted, and auditing of Central Tabulators' totals, we will never again see Democracy in this country.

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #41
53. Or the people speak clearly and make the exit polls say 80% Democratic
we have to win so big they can't steal it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
47. Never say never.
Just watch. If the writing becomes too clear on the wall, someone is going to want to break ranks to become the anti-Republican Republican candidate in 2008. If this does gain momentum it has the potential to take down a lot of people. Ass preservation and wanting to distance oneself from the fallout could be exactly what tips it in favor of impeachment. Only time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. You're right
Politicians will go the way the wind blows...none of them wants to give up their gravy train. It's amazing how one's most deeply held beliefs can undergo an epiphany when the last lifeboats are loading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. This man has definitely moved to the top of "My Heroes" list!!!
Conyers --->:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Conyers never fails to amaze.
The hardest working man in Washington.

Um, who is not a criminal, that is.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kikosexy2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Put the pedal...
to the metal and start the impeachment drive now!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Is it possible? Can it be??
Thank you John Conyers, Thank You God!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. Not every Democrat says they were misled. Some say they'd do it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Who? Do they know about the Downing Street Minutes?

DOWNING STREET MINUTES -- OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT MINUTES OF AN OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT MEETING



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. Talking about Joe Lie berman again, I'm guessing
The big lie about Joe is that he's a Democrat. He's a Democrat like Zell Miller is a Democrat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
17. Impeach Now!!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'm absolutely LIVID!!!
It only takes one member of Congress to begin an impeachment process and our illustrious, COURAGEOUS Dems in Congress haven't already started it???

It's a darn good thing none of them are sitting before me right now, they'd not be finished getting an earful til morn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Where the hell is Kucinich?
He sure as hell wouldn't have anything to lose going for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Yeah really
And McKinney?? Is there someway we can get them on board? And all the other democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. How frustrating
Just ONE of them can do it? How all does this work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. kick and recommended! n/t

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
23. I love John Conyers, he is a true American Patriot..
Edited on Thu Jun-02-05 09:00 PM by converted_democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirrera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
24. It is coming...
No doubt in my mind. They will rig the elections to keep the house in 2006 so they do not get impeached. Let us hope they get caught, or do not dare, or made a deal, and we win the house. I sell bumper stickers to raise money to donate to all the GREAT groups out there fighting for our election integrity, peace and justice, etc. I have a wide variety representing different political issues. The only one that sells is the impeach Bush sticker. Out of 65 that I sold this month, 63 were impeach Bush. Out of the 45 I sold last month, 44 were Impeach Bush. This is every state of the union. It is my own very satisfying poll. Spread it around, it is growing, it is coming.

www.nobullshirt.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. I'll take impeachment for a start
and then I want the whole lot of them sent to the Hague! They are war criminals and need to be tried in an international court as such!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Im with Rosey Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
27. My favorite from another thread


IMPEACH

IMPRISON
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfailed.
Edited on Thu Jun-02-05 10:09 PM by Disturbed
Rep Rangle already prepared Impeachment papers for Rumsfailed. All three should be Impeached. After that indictements for Powell, Rice, Card, Wolfowitz and the rest of the War Criminals.

Edited to add: Kick out Delay vote in Palosi. When Pres.& VP are out Pelosi can be Pres.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. I agree
They all need to go (the whole Bush administration).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #28
50. And the icing on the cake would be...
war crimes tribunals lead by the UN they ignored so blithely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
34. It sounds like Senator Kerry will be carrying this flag to congress
He is going to bring the memo into congress soon and we must support him in this act. Check out his web site to see when it is goign to happen. There is another DU thread concerning it.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Conyers and Kerry. The one-two punch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
37. Chimpeach!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
38. Overview of Impeachment Process
<http://www.law.cornell.edu/background/impeach/impeach.htm>

The Impeachment Process in a Nutshell

1. The House Judiciary Committee deliberates over whether to initiate an impeachment inquiry.

2. The Judiciary Committee adopts a resolution seeking authority from the entire House of Representatives to conduct an inquiry. Before voting, the House debates and considers the resolution. Approval requires a majority vote.

3. The Judiciary Committee conducts an impeachment inquiry, possibly through public hearings. At the conclusion of the inquiry, articles of impeachment are prepared. They must be approved by a majority of the Committee.

4. The House of Representatives considers and debates the articles of impeachment. A majority vote of the entire House is required to pass each article. Once an article is approved, the President is, technically speaking, "impeached" -- that is subject to trial in the Senate.

5. The Senate holds trial on the articles of impeachment approved by the House. The Senate sits as a jury while the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presides over the trial.

6. At the conclusion of the trial, the Senate votes on whether to remove the President from office. A two-thirds vote by the Members present in the Senate is required for removal.

7. If the President is removed, the Vice-President assumes the Presidency under the chain of succession established by Amendment XXV.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Jim Sensenbrenner
of Wisconsin is chairman of the House Judiciary committee. Anyone know what he's like?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. Here's his bio on Wikipedia
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Sensenbrenner>

(snip)
Formerly Chairman of the House Science Committee, as of 2005 Sensenbrenner is the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, and is also a member of the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property. In addition, Sensenbrenner serves on the House Committee on Homeland Security.

Sensenbrenner receives high marks from the National Taxpayers Union, an anti-tax non-profit organization.


Legislative record and stance on issues

Sensenbrenner held an important role in the impeachment of Bill Clinton, acting as one of the House managers.

In 2005, Sensenbrenner made the headlines by being a vocal advocate of the Real ID Act which requires additional scrutiny of citizenship before issuing drivers' licenses. Jim Sensenbrenner attached the controversial act as a rider on military spending bill HR418. Subsequently, it was passed by the Senate without debate. <2>

As chairman of the judiciary committee, Sensenbrenner wields significant power over the future of the USA PATRIOT Act. He has been quoted as saying that does not favor making the provisions of the act permanent, but rather wants them to continue to have periodic review by Congress. <3> (http://www.jsonline.com/news/nat/apr05/316792.asp)

Sensenbrenner believes in criminal prosecution of broadcasters and cable operators who violate decency standards as opposed to the current FCC regulatory methods.<4>

Controversy

In November 2004, Sensenbrenner and California Congressman Duncan Hunter blocked the bill that would have created a National Intelligence Director, a key recommendation of the 9/11 Commission.

On April 26, 2005 it was widely reported that Jim Sensenbrenner has had lobbyists pay for his transportation, a violation of congressional laws. His total travel expenses are higher than any other congressman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #40
49. He'll jump at the chance to impeach a Democrat, but...
is probably a tad more reluctant when the wrongdoing is on his own side of the aisle. On the other hand....see my "never say never" post above. Could get interesting if he feels enough pressure to save his own Republican ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #40
57. He's a grade A conservative
Edited on Sat Jun-04-05 09:11 AM by fujiyama
ass hole.

He's a Bush toadie to the core.

Until pukes lose control of congress, impeachment is a dream. I still think the hearings on the Downing Street Minutes/Memo would be a great idea. These people (those in the admin) deserve some damn subpeanas served to them (though of course I'd say they desrve much worse, like prison sentences).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #38
46. Can the VP be impeached too?
Or rather, I should say, the real person who is the President and pulling the puppet strings?

Then, I guess that leaves us with....Pres. Hastert? :puke:

Impeach him too...whose next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Yes, both offices Pres and VP can be impeached.
If they were both found guilty that would indeed leave us with President Hastert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #48
54. Fine - impeach both * & FUCheney - I can live w/ Prez Hastert
Even though he's another big fat white male shit, anybody would be better than what we have running this country right now....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
44. It only takes one member of Congress to begin an impeachment process
This is a very misleading statement. Go to Thomas and search "impeachment" in the 108th and 109th Congresses. There have been at least one resolution filed in each.

They are referred to the House Judiciary Committee where they sit, unless brought to the full committee by the chair (Sensenbrenner).

Do you really think Sensenbrenner would act on yet another resolution?

This will not happen until the Dems control the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #44
59. Henry Gonzalez of San Antonio
used to introduce impeachment resolutions to the Judiciary Committee once in the while.

He formally submitted one for Reagan. Then for VP Bush. Then a few years later for President Bush the first. Don't know if or how many other congresscritters signed on to his resolutions? I just remember him. There's a nice statue of him at SeaWorld in San Antonio.

I also remember him punching out a critic at a Demnny's when he was about 80.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
45. Kick.
Going to bed. Will read tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
52. Better exposure!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
56. .
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
58. Kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC