Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The USA are on war with France !!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BonjourUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:51 AM
Original message
The USA are on war with France !!!
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/18/opinion/18FRIE.html?th

Journalists should take care when they use certain words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. To my friends in France
I am sorry, our President is an asshole and as you can see, so are most of our journalists.

Just remember that we have been taken over by an administration most of us didn't vote for. Pity us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
39. What an embarrassment
Friedman should walk his talk and immediately head to Afghanistan to replace one of the French soldiers that are fighting side by side with American troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. sorry friend
We are in the grips of a fascist Coup. Even our journalist have gotten stupid and/or are liars. Perhaps France can join with the other Nations of the World and monitor our next election. Those of us who know the last two (I am including some of the 2002 races) were stolen would really appreciate your help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, every time I think the NYT can't sink any lower ...
Edited on Thu Sep-18-03 06:14 AM by Kellanved
something like this happens.
And that even after Bush practically admitted that "old Europe" was right all along :shrug: .

Friedman lives in a strange reality. I don't see that more troops translate to more security/a better development. As for the money: as long as the calls for transparency and accountability go unanswered, I don't see any more European money than the current development aid in Iraq (a few 100M). Not that €5B would be more than the proverbial drop in a bucket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
21. Friedman is a globalization-obsessed, Israeli-security-obsessed crank.
Do European columnists take the liberty of speaking for their governments? Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. They do
Edited on Thu Sep-18-03 09:51 AM by Kellanved
Not that different - in fact sometimes it seems to me as if they're using Safire as a template. (Then again: I can't remember the last time a columnist argued in favour of the Government - :shrug: - the liberal media...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. Safire's problem is that he was the government--part of it, anyway
Edited on Thu Sep-18-03 09:54 AM by BurtWorm
I don't know what Friedman's confusion is based on. I think it's a sports thing, rooting for and identifying with the home team, which is an attitude that's endemic among US journos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #37
47. Interesting
I don't think it's a mistake to identify with the "home team" (something rarely done in our Media - the home team is bashed - be it in sports or in "real life"); however Friedman’s column is published in European Magazines as well (for example in Germany's Der Spiegel; and many people read the NYT itself) - he could at least watch his words. Why is he declaring France an enemy? I think "Rival" is a pretty strong word, no need to overdo it.
His analysis isn't that sharp either: I heard the same thing in the days prior to the war by our opposition (" Throw in our forces now, it will make Saddam surrender"). The argument was as faulty then as it is now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #47
54. He's not paid to think. He's paid to bloviate.
He's a professional gasbag. As are most pundits in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. Friedman is insane
The guy has gone over the edge.

If France were serious, it would be using its influence within the European Union to assemble an army of 25,000 Eurotroops, and a $5 billion reconstruction package...

Oh Really, Tom. Why should ANY country feel obligated to cater to YOUR delusions?

Time constraints prevent me from mounting a point-by-point rebuttal of Friedman's nonsense. I can only express my utter contempt for his "white man's burden", we-must-remake-the-world-to-conform-to-OUR-superior-blueprint colonialist mindset. And even there, words fail me...

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Where have all the liberals gone?
As an outsider (European) I always thought of NYT as a more liberal left leaning newspaper, but judging on people like Friedman and the likes it apparently isn't so. So much about liberal bias....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. What a total ass
The Muslims are coming! The Muslims are coming! Oh certainly, Muslim extremists take over Iraq and that means French Muslims are going to suddenly prefer that to democracy and freedom. Friedman must have the French Muslims confused with Alabama fundamentalists. I fear the radical uprising by our own fundamentalists alot more than I do any Muslims. Too bad Freidman doesn't see the danger in *his* own backyard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonjourUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. French Muslims are only less 8% to practice their religion
The fundies are too much present in our suburbs but very much less than in London where they preach Jihad in the streets without to be bother by the police.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
October Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. Kick
Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. Friedman is not the only journalist I have heard say "others" should send
troops to replace Americans in Iraq....What makes these guys think countries that didn't want this insane war would want to send their young people to become sitting ducks targets in Iraq? My country (Canada) is donating money, which is fine with me, but I sure don't want our young people to go over there....France, no doubt feels the same way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. He's not a 'journalist', he's a propagandist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I agree. Friedman is a propagandist with seemingly no care about
how his words will be perceived outside of the US. He an apologist for the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. Friedman seems like a free-associating madman here...
I have seen him on several shows lately and his basic take on the Iraqmire is that WMDs were never a big deal and that "regime change" was the best and only motive for the invasion--AND HE SUPPORTS THIS DOCTRINE...which reveals him to be a lunatic in my eyes.

I think what we have here is Amnerika's leading "opinion-whore" or the ME and the Muslim world, a man who does not read or speak Arabic and whose ultimate loyalty is to some sort of corporate-Western suprematist religion.

He is very very scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imax2268 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. What...?
Edited on Thu Sep-18-03 07:29 AM by imax2268
Who the hell is this assmunch...?

See the only problem with a free press is that assholes with "NO CLUE" what-so-ever are allowed to spew this type of bullshit...

makes me sick...

get a real job Friedman...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinayellowdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Pulitzer-winning author of From Beirut to Jerusalem
and first runner up in the "how far they have fallen" contest among formerly respectable journalists turned shameless Bush whores. But grand prize clearly belongs to Bob Woodward, whose once illustrious name will go down in infamy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #16
44. True
I used to respect Friedman. I thought The Lexus and the Olive Tree provided some great insights into the ramifications on globalization.

But I agree: He's Lost IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
55. how far they have fallen is right
glad someone posted this thread. I used to respect him. But get this:

"If you add up how France behaved in the run-up to the Iraq war (making it impossible for the Security Council to put a real ultimatum to Saddam Hussein that might have avoided a war)"


He has gone totally insane.

What on earth is he talking about? There were no weapons of mass destruction and no connection to 9-11. Why did we have to invade Iraq IMMEDIATELY? France was just asking for more time to let the inspectors do their job. There was talk about France joining us if the inspectors could have 4 extra months. But Bush and Blair said Saddam was going to attack us in 45 minutes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. If all else fails, blame the French...
France has been our oldest and staunchest ally. Friedman is full of shit. I agree with one line: 'France was right'. They sure were, and all the more reason they shouldn't sacrifice a single dime or soldier to this administration's ill-fated effort in Iraq. Fuck you, Friedman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Oldest yes, staunchest no
Britain is clearly America's staunchest ally. If you want to push into minor powers a case can be made for Australia or Israel. But I think Britain is far ahead of the pack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. France supported us during the Revolution...
against Great Britain, but if it makes you feel better, I'll change it to, 'France is one of our oldest and staunchest allies.' These days, the British government is willing to follow America into hell, so I guess they should get credit for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Isere Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
42. It's the last refuge of scoundrels!
It's a sad, sad day when we project our frustrations on our old friends and allies! The whole misadventure in Iraq has gone so far amok that someone has to take the blame. Who better than our arch-enemy France?

I am sick at heart and mad as hell. Assez!

"Il pleure dans mon coeur
Comme il pleut sur la ville..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
17. This more embarrassing than "Freedom Fries"
Friedman would have to reach up to scratch a snake's belly. That commentary is not only unprofessional and illogical, it reads like an adolescent hissy fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. i do hope you are aware that you are speaking with
or at least hearing from a rather unique portion of the US populace. many people in this country will agree with the article to some extent. like me for example, who would rate the article at at least a seven out of ten on the right on scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonjourUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yes, I'm aware
that I'm speaking with some suvivors of Alamo ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
22. I hate to say it but, HE'S RIGHT!!!!!
Look, the French are a bunch of sniveling asswipes. While I happened to agree with them on Iraq I personally think that if Bush had ignored Iraq, the French would have demanded invasion. They pulled the same crap during the entire Clinton Administration. It's not about ideology to them, it's about power.

Flame away. I can take it, I'm a liberal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. lol
I'm a liberal!

sure you sgr2...sure you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Well, let me see here
I'm a strong Democrat. I hate Bush. I'm pro-choice, pro-labor, pro-environment, in favor of gun control, for progressive taxation, and in favor of a more humble foreign policy.

So, yes I am a liberal.

But I'm not blind to the fact that when we beat Bush in 2004 the French will treat a Democratic President with just as much backbiting. They have an interest in consolidating power within the European Union. That interest isn't served well by a powerful United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. liberals dont insult an entire nation by referring to them as "asswipes"
because of the actions of it's leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evil_Dewers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. That means we are asswipes...
because of the actions of our "leaders."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. It's one thing to say the French
"have an interest in consolidating power within the European Union." It's another to call them "sniveling asswipes." One is a reasonable and informed analysis, and the other is freep-worthy, hateful blather.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evil_Dewers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Dear cheese eating surrender monkeys...
Bring it. Bring it on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evil_Dewers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. Bill Clinton should run for president of France...
According to their constitution, he is eligible to run since he is a descendent of the French who settled in old Louisiana.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonjourUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #24
43. Of course, we need to consolidate power within EU
All powers need counterpowers. But that doesn't mean against.

You have got Bush perhaps you'll get another one a day. And if a counterpower exists perhaps another "Iraqi adventure" will not be possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evil_Dewers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. Time to give back...
the Statue of Liberty along with a million grosses of "freedom" fries and "freedom" toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paschall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #22
36. Really?
"I personally think that if Bush had ignored Iraq, the French would have demanded invasion. They pulled the same crap during the entire Clinton Administration."

During the Clinton years, the French governments--both left and right--pushed to relieve the UN sanctions on Iraq for humanitarian reasons. Is that what you're saying is the "same crap" as a murderous invasion and occupation?

"...the French would have demanded invasion." ROFLAO! You know NOTHING about the French!

Read this carefully (and remember where the US was in Vietnam as De Gaulle spoke) http://www.charles-de-gaulle.org/article.php3?id_article=530
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonjourUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #22
40. Millions people in the street…
were there about power ? In France and elsewhere ?

France worked with Clinton in all the great world affairs. Our soldiers was and always are with ours in all the fights where the world security is really in danger. From the beginning of 2002 to beginning of the war on Iraq, French leaders, TV, press... said what the USA was going to live. You're living it now and we're not responsible for.

BUT we know that we will have to go over there too. BUT not under any conditions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustipatedinCA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #22
50. You promised you were leaving
I remember it clearly. You were going on a self-imposed exile until after the primaries.

And yet, here I am reading this jingoistic garbage. Again.

What happened to your promise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evil_Dewers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
25. France has an aircraft carrier...
Edited on Thu Sep-18-03 09:41 AM by Evil_Dewers
nuclear bombs and nuclear missiles. Tom works in Manhattan. All DU'ers please vacate the tri-state area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #25
32. Two carriers (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evil_Dewers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. I know about the Charles DeGaulle...
what's the name of the other carrier?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Foch
Edited on Thu Sep-18-03 09:53 AM by Kellanved
Edit: Sorry, that one is decomissioned. One Carrier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
38. ne faites pas attention a Friedman
He supported the war on Iraq mainly because he has such a low opinion of Arabs. They're Untermensch, to be alternately invaded, pitied, put down. Now Friedman's deluded himself into believing that France is to blame not just for the war itself, but also for the bad aftermath. You French just didn't try hard enough to stop les Busheviques, so it's all your fault!

Here's hoping that the French embassy or UN delegation writes to the Times to set the record straight and urge Friedman to get a grip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. vraiment!
Cher ami, ecoutez-moi. C'est dommage, mais le "President" est fou, et il a la merde dans la tete. Aussi dommage, le New York Times toujours donnent une pousse a la derriere de Bush et les fascistes.

Pardonnez-moi pour le mots que ne sont pas tres bon. Ma dernier class de Francais etait en 1978.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #41
45. Vous êtes pardonnés.
;)

L'arbuste vraiment a la merde dans la tete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonjourUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #45
49. No, Bush = "buisson" in French :
In a bush we can find brambles and thorns
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonjourUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #41
46. I believe my english is so bad as your French
Edited on Thu Sep-18-03 10:28 AM by BonjourUSA
But thank for you effort.

Dégagez Bush de la WH. Sinon je pense sincèrement que nous courons vers la catastrophe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #46
48. dammit....I knew I should have paid attention in French class!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evil_Dewers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #46
52. Gerhard Schroeder und Jacques Chirac
Edited on Thu Sep-18-03 10:33 AM by Evil_Dewers
werden jetzt vereinigt. Bush ist ein vereinige, nicht ein Teiler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #46
53. Hahahahaha! Some things NEVER change!!
Please be clear I am only teasing you Bonjour, but the time I spent in France was EARMARKED by Parisiennes who would say what you just said (only they MEANT it to be rude....you've gotta admit they are NOT the best examples of hospitality) Your post just gave me a chuckle as I was 17 and got the DIRTIEST looks when I spoke French in Paris....in Nice it was quite different :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
51. Holy f*cking sh#t! - It's France's fault we couldn't avoid war with Iraq??
(making it impossible for the Security Council to put a real ultimatum to Saddam Hussein that might have avoided a war)

Oh my God!!!!!
Get a freaking straight jacket for this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC