Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: America has no right to impose its form of government on others.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:36 AM
Original message
Bush: America has no right to impose its form of government on others.
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 01:46 AM by Radical Activist
At the dedication of the Lincoln Presidential Museum today Bush said:

"Americans have no right or calling to impose our own form of government on others."

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=46065

I'm amazed. This was Bush's last and final rationalization for the war in Iraq. His first two excuses were outright lies. There were no weapons of mass destruction. There were no ties to Al-Qaeda or 911. His only remaining excuse was to bring freedom and democracy to the people of Iraq, which Bush now says we don't have the right to do. What then, was the purpose of invading Iraq? Statements like this make my head want to explode.

Despite Bush's words, his actions show us that he does believe we have the right to impose our form of capitalist representative government on others because he has already done it in two nations. Bush joins the ranks of people like Mussolini and Stalin who felt it was perfectly acceptable to invade and/or occupy other nations because their form of government was supposedly superior.

Anyone would have to be an extremely naive idealist to believe Bush invaded Iraq for humanitarian reasons. Bush has never leveled with the American public or the troops about the true reasons for the Iraq war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. My head has just exploded
woah...


and people will hear this and never once "hear" the disconnect!

Unreal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. America has a long history of imposing governments on others
Okay, you already knew that!

The CIA's website has an article about how the agency organized and financed the overthrow of Iran's DEMOCRATIC government of Iran in 1954. See link below. This is only ONE example of the many examples of U.S. meddling in foreign countries that causes anger at America (and helped cause 9/11)....

http://www.cia.gov/csi/studies/vol48no2/article10.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. 9/11 was an inside job.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. why did he say this--What was the context of his talk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Again, it was the dedication of the Lincoln Presidential Museum.
He was trying to say that the ideals of freedom and liberty for all people found in the Declaration of Independence should apply to the entire world, and that the US should help spread those ideals. He's trying to cast himself as Lincoln on a global scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
35. Code for his racist rabid Lost Cause supporters
He really means Lincoln and the Union had no right to impose a slavery-free society on the South.

(I'm not really serious . . . . I think)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I don't think so
I think Arabs are justifiably angry at the USA and Pan Am 103 should have been a wake-up call. Sept. 11 was done by Arabs, not Bush. Whether Bush allowed it to happen is possible, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Even if they LIHOP.
It was STILL an inside job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. "Inside job," my ass
Arabs are quite capable of pulling-off a "9/11" attack without the help of Bush. Read the history of American brutality in the Middle East and you'll see why 9/11 was bound to happen, just like the bombing of Pan Am 103 was bound to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
25. Explain the holes in the Official Story.
Man, some people can't help but go sailing on that big river in Egypt, eh?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
27. However, they did get the help of Bush
The biggest help they got was when the government changed the airspace-penetration rules. In the days before Bush, when an aircraft on flight plan went outside its announced flight path by a certain distance--I think it was one mile--the Air Force was required to send up a fighter to investigate. (This is one of the reasons the Air Force has bases all over the country.) These rules were very publicly put into effect in October 1999 when golfer Payne Stewart's plane lost cabin pressure and everyone on it died.

In the months before 9/11, Bush changed this to require presidential authorization to scramble fighters. And very conveniently, when the hijackings were occurring Bush was at a hotel in Florida being prepared for a photo opportunity...and when the first plane hit he had just walked out of the hotel to be taken to an elementary school.

Add to this the PDB scandal. In August 2001, Bush received a Presidential Daily Brief entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike Within U.S." In September 2001, nineteen people bought one-way cross-country plane tickets with cash and checked in with no luggage. That ain't normal, people. I mean, you fly across the country and you're at least going to need clean socks at the other end, right? And the only reason to fly one-way across the country, assuming you're not planning to blow the plane up, is to move there. (Which means you need at least a suitcase--even if the Lord told you to give all your possessions to charity and start afresh in your new city, you still need a couple of changes of clothing to go house hunting in, right?) And these guys apparently showed quite a lot of anxiety, far more than the normal traveler. Airline employees are trained to look for people like that.

The Air Force was stood down and the airline security was stood down after Bush found out that terrorists were planning attacks in this country. How much help do they really need?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vSmith Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Hell yeah
So was the job in 1993...Damn you Chimpy, it was coming to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leftest Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. Yup
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 02:10 AM by Leftest


- Iran

And the other ones I can think of right now at the moment are:

- Guatemala
- Honduras
- Nicaragua
- El Salvador
- Bolivia
- Cuba
- Haiti
- Chile
- Panama
- Laos
- Syria
- Greece
- Dominican Republic
- Afghanistan

And there are more.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LatePeriduct Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here's a quote you'll never forget.
Bush: I never was impeached, I don't know what you're talking about.

6 months after Bush is formally impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. Say what!
Oh! That means that we have to 'watch over' (kill the protestors) until thay see that their government doestn't have to be like ours just so it grovels to the U$ and gives up all their wealth to U$ Corps!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. Yeah, but then he goes on to justify imposition couched in other
words (why does Bush's ego require applause comments?)
.....

Yet, American interests and values are both served by standing for liberty in every part of the world. (Applause.)

Our interests are served when former enemies become democratic partners -- because free governments do not support terror or seek to conquer their neighbors. Our interests are served by the spread of democratic societies -- because free societies reward the hopes of their citizens, instead of feeding the hatreds that lead to violence. Our deepest values are also served when we take our part in freedom's advance -- when the chains of millions are broken and the captives are set free, because we are honored to serve the cause that gave us birth. (Applause.)

.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. The applause breaks in the transcript don't match the real applause.
I was there and the biggest applause line was his cheap comment about Lincoln quoting the Bible. This was a Republican crowd excited to see him and the response was still rather tepid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. What gets me is the mixing of two different media
When I watch a sitcom, I expect to hear fake laughs, applause and other sound effects to pump up the show. I also know that people in live studio audiences see signs for applause, etc. But it's for the audio presentation.

It's plain goofy, in print media, to add sound effects, as if people are too moronic to read the words for themselves without having to have a verbal audio-to-print cue.

When I see that, I imagine all the great literature or speeches with reactions in parentheses.

"Four score and seven years ago, our forefathers" (hoo-ah)

"My friends, no one, not in my situation, can appreciate my feeling of sadness at this parting. (Awwwwwwwwww) To this place, and the kindness of these people, I owe everything. (Applause)

Of all the devices this manipulative administration uses, the word cues in *'s speeches have to be the most obnoxious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. haha I love the
Lincoln quotes with the audience reactions. Funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. Hmm
Do you think they added in applause for effect? Wouldn't surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. It was probably part of the original text of the speech.
So dipshit would know when to pause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
16. It's Bush's way of saying...
... that it's not what we're doing, not what we intended. It's just more Bushspeak, to convince the public that we invaded another country for entirely altruistic reasons. That way, when it all goes to shit, he can say, it's not my fault. The Iraqis did it to themselves.

It's completely pathological, but that's the way Bush and his people think. So far, it's worked, too. We "liberated" the Iraqis, and the attendant suffering is their problem.

Get ready for more of it in the next few months....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Translation: If spreading Democracy with napalm didn't work
don't blame me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. There's that aspect of it...
... but I think Bush has a very different notion of what democracy is than do most of us.

If one looks at his attitude about it domestically, that's a hint. The offhand comments about dictatorships being easier, his legislation diminishing individual rights, his clear disrespect for the voting process and his heightened degree of government secrecy and public perception manipulation all point to someone with a distaste for genuine democracy.

That might seem hypocritical of him (and certainly is, to a degree), but I think Bush conceives of spreading democracy as the proliferation of opportunity for US businesses--his definition is very likely that narrow. It's definitely not a so-called "free market" system, in any sense of the word, that he's advocating. He thinks war for the sake of American business is spreading democracy--that democracy is the same thing as American business.

It's the height of delusion, but, nevertheless, he believes it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I think that's exactly right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. Definietly
I definietly think so too. Remember when he said once how he means everything he says and everything he says his scripted from Karl Rove and written by a speech writer. They had him say this for a reason. Maybe something is about to hit the fan and he won't be caught so they can't impeach him. :shrug: He has some motiave though I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
17. No right to impose our... whaaaaH??
Did any of you guys happen to see where the last THREE YEARS went?
They were just here, I was looking right at them --and then they vanished or something without a trace.

Does this mean I can call myself three years younger now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
20. OMG
Can I pound my head into the wall please? What the hell reason have we been in Iraq for?!?!?! Why have over 1500 of our soliders died for?! Fucking moron!!!! :banghead: :rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindoctor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
24. That was one of his talking points during the 1999 campaign
Say what you will about the man, but a flip-flopper he is not.

(uncontrolable cough)

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lab2112 Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
26. Bush is right...
...we're not imposing our own form of government on others, especially Iraq.

The puppet Quislings who comprise the so-called Iraqi government won't be spreading democracy or freedom for the common Iraqi man or woman to enjoy. Their only true function is to enable Pax Americana to further entrench itself in Iraq, and, by extension, the whole of the Middle East.

Or in other words, we shouldn't be imposing our own form of government on others, because it would impede the bottomline for all those American contractors helping with "reconstruction" in Iraq, as well as Dick Cheney's deferred compensation from Halliburton.

Gotta keep our priorities in order, you know.

LAB

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. So it will be government by international corporation
Well, that's exactly Bush's idea of what America government is.

You make a good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. excellent point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
32. Statements like this make me want to pull my face off!
bush** must think everyone has a memory as short as his apparently is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liam_laddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. HUH?
Shouldn't the quote read "We Bushes have no right or calling to impose our own form of government on Americans."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
34. Now that's hypocrisy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC