Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I just got it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 03:17 PM
Original message
I just got it
Edited on Wed Apr-13-05 03:55 PM by linazelle
Heard Randi explain to another caller why preventing gay marriage is discriminatory and illegal. I, like most people, have the biblical understanding of marriage mixed with the state's legal performance of marriage.

It makes sense to me now that marriage does not have to have any religious aspects at all. It is a CIVIL union. It can only be done with the sanction of the state. It can only be broken with the sanction of the state. The fact that clergymen preside over marriages does not give the church the power to sanction marriage. A denomination may denounce gay marriage but that has nothing to do with legality.

Randi was a bit exasperated explaining this saying she's done it a million times. I hadn't heard it that way before--that the state cannot discriminate against any group of people and that marriage is a state function.

I'm sure millions haven't heard this either. It just goes to show how much education and discourse are needed to bring the public up to snuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Short way to explain it -- confusion of religious rites with civil rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's not Gay Marriage
It's Gay Marriage benefits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. My first marriage was in a courthouse
I know a whole number of people who were married in a courthouse, as a matter of fact.

Just because no religion 'sanctified' it doesn't mean it wasn't valid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. exactly, the legal document (marriage license) is the legal document
not whatever words the preacher reads. Nowadays, in most places, if you marry in the curch you must also have the marriage license, which is what makes the marriage legal. The preacher's words are a ceremony with no validity (excepting common law) unless there is also the marriage license.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Right...and gay marriages have been taking place for many years
Edited on Wed Apr-13-05 03:22 PM by Terran
because liberal pastors and others have been willing to sanctify them for years. That has nothing whatsoever to do with the state's marriage functions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. True. Good friends of mine are married, but they do not have the
protection of a civil contract governed by existing secular laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here's a good blurb on what it takes to get leaglly married
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. I was married in city hall by the mayor. You are missing the point that
there are a group of extremists who want US civil law to BE biblical law.... and not just regarding marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I didn't miss the point about the RW trying to mesh civil and biblical
law...it's a given. But thanks for the reminder since I assumed everybody knew that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. yes. i've long held the belief
that marriage is strictly a business enterprise.


tie all the romance you want to it, but when it comes down to it - when the credit reports merge, there's nothing romantic about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. In some countries, civil & religious marriage ceremonies are separate.
Mexico & France come to mind--both countries that have seen serious religious unrest.

One goes to the registry office & signs the papers. Then, one goes to church/whatever for the religious ceremony. Finally, there's a party! Some people skip #2 but if they skip #1--they aren't married!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Marriage is a legal contract, usually between two people,
but could be more to share their lives and economic assets with each other, this means the bad times as well as the good times if that what the contract states. Yes, most people tie romance to marriage, but it's not necessary. It's really about a partnership that has certain expectations of each partner. If one of the partners doesn't meet up to the obligations of the contract then it can be dissolved. It's really simple when you break it down to it's man made components.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. >usually between two people
When it isn't between two people what is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Polygamy.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Whew, I was a little worried that we were getting into uncharted
territory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. In Italy, you HAVE to go to the registry office to marry
You go, you get the stamp, you sign the book, and AFTER you (can) go to the church for a "wedding" that is religious (much like Camilla and Chuckie). The Italians want their tax paid, and they are gonna get it! And the priests will not marry you without the paper from the registry, unless you got married secularly elsewhere; then you have to provide those marriage documents, plus parish permissions, plus baptismal certificates, all with certified translations, and then get the OK of the local bishop AND pay a fee (donation) to the church, and to the priest, and so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Isn't that what we do here? You apply for a license, wait three days for
the blood and paperwork to come back, then have a ceremony, either religious or secular. The person who performed the ceremony signs and files with the state. In FL, it can be a notary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. The difference is, when you leave the Italian office
...you are married in the eyes of the state. If you want to be right with the church, you carry on and do the thing with them. But it is a religious accessory, not a requirement!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Got it. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. Was that you today
that called her show and said what you just said? If it was you, you were great. I'm too chicken to call Randi. She scares me :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Nope I heard the caller too--it wasn't me. n/t
Edited on Wed Apr-13-05 04:02 PM by linazelle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. we were married in courthouse, told husband, i will give up title
of marriage and have a civil union with him. i dont need the word marriage. the right wants that word, they can have, we will with honor be in civil union.

those that want to be wed in church can follow church doctrine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. "Marriage" is and always has been about PROPERTY and ...
... ENTITLEMENTS. One such 'entitlement' (a government-granted authority) is the authority to speak on another's behalf when they're unable to speak for themselves, much as a parent may speak for a child. (In this, I use "speak" in a legal sense of "make choices.")

Under the woman-as-chattel tradition, she was a kind of property DEEDED to a male ("husband") by another male ("father") along with a payment ("dowery") for taking on the responsibility and expense of "husbandry".

The overwhelming reason churches even became involved was political power - the inheritance of TITLES (entitlement) in monarchical systems. The whole romantic notion of marriage as something "sacred" is a recent myth. Adultery was a PROPERTY crime - violation of an entitlement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. Marriage is actually a 3-way agreement, You, Your Spouse and the
State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC