Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I propose that Neo-Cons NEVER GET CALLED NEO_LIBERALS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 12:47 AM
Original message
I propose that Neo-Cons NEVER GET CALLED NEO_LIBERALS
on this site and in the progressive movement. I am from Canada and we love the word Liberal.

In fact every nation in the West is a Liberal Democracy.

Liberal is a word for the Democrats. Liberal is a great word. Neocons debased the word in the 1980s. It is up to us to take back the word.

Never, ever call a neocon a neo-liberal. Do not let them rebrand and take over the word liberal.

Liberalism is the enlightenment. Liberalism is good information, international trade, democracy, mixed market economies (that all Western nations have even the US still).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hippiepunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who ever called em'
Neo-Liberals? What the hell is a neo-liberal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceProgProsp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. People who want free (liberated) trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiepunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. So, like Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceProgProsp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I've read here at DU that Clinton didn't have a problem with Chavez.
And he also prefered Aristide in Haiti over the neoliberals who've been reinstalled there. He also wasn't willing to invade Iraq.

So, like all things, there are degrees...n
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiepunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I like Clinton
I wasn't insulting him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceProgProsp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. When I say they want trade "liberated" I mean:
- they want trade to be the foremost, the guiding principle of politics and society. They want all other considerations secondary to profits for multinational corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiepunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well then
they aren't liberals at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. They destroyed the word liberal for us - now they don't want to be
called neo-cons? Which leaves us with neo-liberals (which is what the textbooks call them). No way!

I'm Canadian alright and I am for trade and not for Empires or war - perpetual wars so you can have perpetual markets. Not smoking the hash either (none of which will be legalized.. they are just talking decriminalization of pot). I am a liberal and for norms like environmental ones and market regulation that favors the middle class and the masses. I am for multilateral ism. I am for arms reduction. Liberalism has not been tarnished in my country. Our liberals are just like Clinton and know that we cannot survive unless we participate in the world. Clinton is a million miles away from what the neocons have done to the USA.

I just do not want to see the bunch of liars dropping their name.
I will be calling them neocons forever.

You can consider it childish if you would like. I say it has much more to do with propaganda (theirs).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. No. Liberal means open. Clinton is for the Third Way which is about
trade but also about setting international standards for things like arms control, or health care, or regulating the environment.

Liberal is a great word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. The textbooks call them neo-liberals. As soon as Israel is at peace
they could try and bolt from the republican party. They are called neoliberal because liberal is what all the Western Democracies are. We have mixed economies and such. We get to vote. These are all liberal things. Even the Repukes would be considered liberal in the past.

Liberal means you trade with outside countries and you are open to ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. They're both real words with real meanings.
Sorry. I'm not going to redefine language in such a worthless manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. The neocons are the ones redefining. They suddenly refuse to be
labeled as such. Sorry - I do not go for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I don't accept any sort of redefining. But they're not.
Edited on Sat Apr-09-05 01:45 PM by Lone Pawn
If a neocon who is talking about free trade wishes to be called neoliberal, then let him. Because that's what neoliberal means. And if a liberal who's talking about an aggressive foreign policy wants to be called neconservative, then let him. The two terms often go hand-in-hand.

The term 'neoliberal' has been in consistant use since the mid '70s. Nobody is 'redefining' the word here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC