Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sea Shepherd: 24 Hours in the Killing Fields

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:41 AM
Original message
Sea Shepherd: 24 Hours in the Killing Fields
http://www.seashepherd.org/news/media_050329_5.html
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society promotes the distribution of their copyrighted material, so long as there is no compensation.

03/29/2005

24 Hours in the Killing Fields

From: The Sea Shepherd Marine Conservation ship Farley Mowat


2000 Hours Atlantic Standard Time

1600 Pacific Standard Time


The Gulf of St. Lawrence near the Magdalen Islands

The Sea Shepherd ship Farley Mowat has completed the first day of documentation of the horrific seal slaughter in the Gulf of St. Lawrence.

The day began at 0600 Hours AST with the Farley Mowat and her crew surrounded by over eighty sealing vessels escorted by two large Canadian Coast Guard ice-breakers the Amundsen and the Cornwallis.

The night before brought heavy gale winds which crushed the hull of one sealing boat and damaged numerous other vessels.

When the Farley Mowat crew began to document the killing by the sealing vessel Newfoundland Leader, the Coast Guard ship Amundsen came charging through the ice, crushing seal pups in its path. The ice-breaker narrowly avoided collision with the Farley Mowat only because the Farley Mowat put her engines into full reverse to prevent a ramming by the Amundsen.

The Amundsen shadowed the Farley Mowat throughout the day and came dangerously close on many occasions.

The sealing vessel Gulf Clipper attempted to ram the Farley Mowat forcing Captain Paul Watson to back down to avoid a collision. As the Gulf Clipper passed before the bow of the Farley Mowat, the sealing captain pointed a high-powered rifle with scope at the bridge of the Farley Mowat and then trained it on crewmember Jon Batchelor who was standing on the bow at the time.

Captain Watson reported the incident to the Mounted Police officers on board the Amundsen with a request that they order the sealers to desist from pointing weapons at his crew. The Mounties refused to do so.

Apparently, the authorities are more concerned with seal defenders aiming cameras at seal killers than with sealers aiming rifles at seal protectors.

The Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) notified Captain Paul Watson that the crew of the Farley Mowat were in violation of the seal protection (Marine Mammal) regulations by coming within a half a nautical mile of a seal being killed. He was informed that no sealer could be filmed or photographed without a permit from the DFO.

Captain Watson replied that every crewmember had applied for a permit but could not get them issued as the only place DFO was willing to issue them was in the Magdalen Islands where the crew had received death threats and where Captain Watson and his crew had previously been violently assaulted.

Captain Watson said that the crew would continue to document infractions by sealers and asked why the sealers were not being cited for illegal killing. "I saw a sealer kick a pup in the face," said Captain Watson.

The DFO officer replied that he had more pressing concerns than the actions of the sealers.

Later in the afternoon, the crew of the Farley Mowat were able to prevent a sealing crew from killing seals on a large pan of ice. Sixteen crew fanned out across the ice between the seals and the sealers. The sealers retreated and returned to their boat and left the area.

"It was a small victory," said Sea Shepherd Director Dr. Jerry Vlasak. "In the midst of this carnage, saving even a few lives is a cause for rejoicing. It is our one ship against over a hundred sealing vessels and the ships and aircraft of the Canadian government. This is a government sponsored and subsidized killing field. We are trying to do the best we can to bring this atrocity to the attention of the world and to save what lives we can."

The tranquil blue-white ice fields that have served the harp seals as a nursery for the last three weeks have been turned into a Dantean portrait from hell. Streams of blood flow and pool on the ice and the vacant-eyed, cruelly-skinned corpses of thousands of seal pups litter the ice. In the open leads, bleeding bodies bob, many sinking and not recorded in the quotas. The seals are being shot, kicked in the face, and bashed with clubs and spiked clubs called hak-a-piks.

"If ever there was a portrait of man's inhumanity and remorseless cruelty, this mass slaughter is it." said Captain Paul Watson.

"What we are recording here is evidence to back up our international campaign to boycott Canadian seafood products. It is our intention to build this into a worldwide protest movement. We did it in the Seventies and we will do it again." said Captain Watson.

The day ended with a stand-off between the Coast Guard and the crew of the Farley Mowat. The Farley Mowat has been ordered out of the area but has refused to leave. The Coast Guard have tried to intimidate the crew but have not taken any actions to board and arrest the seal defenders.

The slaughter is set to resume again at 0600 Hours on March 30th, and the Farley Mowat and her crew will again be in the thick of the killers and their government-financed protectors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh my
this is very, very sad
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. "If ever there was a portrait of man's inhumanity and remorseless cruelty,
"this mass slaughter is it."

I don't know about that.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Whoa!
That is damn sad......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Right. I forgot about the limits on compassion. Sorry.
You'd have to admit, though maybe not "it" it certainly is a portrait of such, yes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. A portrait, sure.
I'm just suggesting a smidgen of perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Perspective makes it all the worse to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. It's the same kind of behavior, though, wouldn't you agree?
Mindless slaughter in the name of profit, without regard to life or suffering, is the kind of thinking that leads to deeper atrocities.

It's not necessary to equate the two to see the continuum that connects them. imo, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Slam dunk, right here.
yardwork certainly gets it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Not really. I'm not going to equate genocide with a managed industry,
however ugly that industry may be. There is a limit on the number of seals which can be killed, they are not endangered, and they are killed for their product potential, not to eradicate them from the face of the Earth. There is no "Final Solution" of the Harp Seal "problem" underway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smbolisnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick
This is so terrible. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace4all Donating Member (428 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. I feel sick ..Oh Canada......:-(....../n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Shameless self-kick...for the seals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. What about the horrific cow slaughter in Chicago every day?

That is not a news story, it's a propaganda piece. It just drips with emotionally charged language meant to mold your opinions and conclusions. What to some is "horrific slaughter" is to others "seal hunt" and to others "pelt harvesting". It all depends on what reaction one wishes to manipulate the reader into having.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. What about it? I'm equally outraged over that slaughter.
This is news based on the biased governmental reaction to individuals acting out of compassion. What if YOU were protesting the RNC, and someone pointed a gun at you? The cops drove a squad car at you. That'd be news, right? Maybe the way you'd describe the scenario might also be emotionally charged, eh? Maybe viewed as propaganda by the freeper folk, ya think?

The reader's compassion would dictate their reaction. Cruelty is cruelty.

BTW, scroll through the list of threads here in GD, and I think you'll find a good percentage of them fit what you JUST stated here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Ron Regan's Anti-foie gras rant was great today...
From Dawnwatch's newsletter:

Today, on the MSNBC show "Connected: Coast to Coast," Ron Reagan gave a wonderful commentary on foie gras, saying that animal rights groups are correct to call its production "a cruel and unnecessary practice." He also mentioned other cruel practices, calling our food industries "equal opportunity abusers." The piece is transcribed on the MSNBC website at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6969478/ and I will paste it below. Please send and an appreciative comment to Ron Reagan at: [email protected] .

March 30, 2005 | 1:04 p.m. ET
Objection to foie gras (Ron Reagan)


At Hurley's restaurant in Portland, Oregon, there's one thing you won't find on the menu: Pate de Foie Gras. In case you're wondering, that's a sort of liver puree, usually from ducks or geese. Oh, they've got it. But you'll have to have a private word with the waiter and you might want to whisper. Hurley's, like a number of restaurants around the country, has gone into stealth mode when it comes to this gourmet treat.

The reason: pressure from animal rights groups who say the techniques used to produce foie gras are a “cruel and unnecessary practice.” They're correct.

Foie gras is created by force-feeding grain to waterfowl in order to unnaturally enlarge their livers. Afficionados say they're simply taking advantage of a duck's natural ability to store fat. Last time I checked, there was no natural tendency on the part of ducks to shove stainless steel tubes down their throats and pump in huge amounts of half-cooked corn. That's how foie gras is made.

Now, I'm not a vegetarian, mind you. It's just that I have this funny objection to torturing small animals no matter how scrumptious their body parts might be.

And it's not just ducks and geese, is it? Our food industries are equal opportunity abusers: cows, chickens, pigs, and a special mention to those little calves who for their short, miserable lives are locked into crates too small to allow movement just so we can eat veal.

Our mistreatment of these creatures is no reflection on their intrinsic worth, but it does reflect the state of our humanity. The picture is, to say the least, unattractive.

I know we're carnivores. Things die so that we can live. But simple decency requires that, whenever possible, we minimize the suffering of the beings under our control.

I've tasted foie gras. Yes, it's quite good. But not good enough to justify abusing animals.

I won't harangue you anymore— I know this subject makes folks uncomfortable. But here's a suggestion: next time you tuck into your foie gras and marvel at how rich and delicious it is, take a look in the mirror and remind yourself how it got that way.

E-mail [email protected] .

---------------------------------------------------

(DawnWatch is an animal advocacy media watch that looks at animal issues in the media and facilitates one-click responses to the relevant media outlets. You can learn more about it, and sign up for alerts at http://www.dawnwatch.com/. To unsubscribe, go to www.DawnWatch.com/unsubscribe.php. If you forward or reprint DawnWatch alerts, please do so unedited -- leave DawnWatch in the title and include this tag line.)




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Well done.
With only 1 little correction...we're omnivores, not carnivores.

Still, great thoughts put forth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I notice that mistake alot in the MSM....
and here on DU too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. Sea Shepherd..
needs to purchase some effective hardware and return fire. That's all I'm going to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. As I recall, on my visit to The Farley Mowat
they have water cannons, but nothing lethal. That's the way Capt. Watson likes it, not stooping to their level. That isn't to say that when faced with an immediate danger, SSCS hasn't scuttled a vessel or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I was thinking a trip to Russia or the Baltic for..
something a little more "effective".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. Wonderful Toronto Sun OpEd !
Edited on Wed Mar-30-05 09:30 PM by Catchawave
http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/TorontoSun/News/2005/03/26/972760-sun.html

Basically addresses the fact this is not a hunt, but a slaughter and

The Bottom Line:

We don't need to have baby seals slaughtered in front of their mothers, and any who don't see the obscenity of this may need ethical guidance.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. "slaughtered in front of their mothers"???
Can wee say "anthropomorphising"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livinginphotographs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. So you're an expert on whether there are maternal bonds between animals?
I'm in awe. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AFSCME girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. The mothers can tell their pups
by the pup's smell ~ and yes these pups ARE murdered in front of their mothers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. No, but we can say "speciesism"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC