|
Edited on Mon Mar-28-05 07:11 PM by oddtext
i figured out why terri was the great cause for conservatives. conservatives, or, as noam says, radical statists, can't liberate a race like MLK -- they can't threaten power. no sir.
they do have an interest expanding state power and engendering a perception that the state is benign.
so, !TERRI! our cause is bedridden and brain dead!
she's no threat.
she becomes the image of softness and compassion. even if they succeed in their goal of limiting (perceived) state power (radical judges) and restore terri's feed-tube, terri's still bed-ridden, and moreover, brain dead. she's never a threat to the state even tho "liberated" from the tyranny of the radical judges.
if they fail (as was always clear), well, the result is obvious -- the repukes play: radical activist judges and all those sound bytes ad infinitum.
see where i'm driving? i think taking simply the facts of where schiavo things stand and the cause they've chosen to fight for is enlightening as to what conservatives believe democracy is.
semiotically, terri is the cynisism of conservative populism. there are no MLKs or RFKs in repuke ideology. the emancipated (were they to succeed) remain bedridden and brain dead. only miracles, not politics, truly save the emancipated. so, sit on the sidelines, 'murka, and let us (tom delay) mediate 'tween you and the lord above.
huh?
|