|
From an article in a recent "Smithsonian"...
snip>>
The Aztecs were governed by a huey tlatoani, or supreme ruler, who was considered semidivine. Succession to the throne, though not strictly hereditary, tended to remain within the ruling family. Each ruler was selected from among a military council of four controlled by the ruling house.
Aztec society was divided into two distinct social classes: the nobility and the commoners. Nobles, who composed only about 5 percent of the total Aztec population, controlled land, labor and tribute. Most lived in palatial dwellings, wore fine cotton clothing, practiced polygamy, held public office, were exempt from manual labor and were allowed to accumulate and display wealth.
Commoners, who tended to live in simple huts of sun-dried brick and dressed in rough clothing, were required to be monogamous and were prohibited from displaying wealth.
The nobility and the priesthood were at the top of the social order.
Warriors also enjoyed enormous prestige.
snip>>
SOUND FAMILIAR?
It's too bad these "human" characteristics of greed and power are omni-time, omni-culture, omni-country and endless. It's also too bad that the Art, Architecture, Technology and even women's rights of this culture has been forgotten.
(snip<Divorce, we are told, was legal, notably on the grounds of spousal abuse, and mothers could receive custody of their children. Women in childbirth were regarded as warriors, and those who died giving birth received honors due a warrior.>snip)
Blood and flowers together made the Aztecs seem bizarre when I studied the culture years ago. But now, after Abu Ghraib and the complete MSM shut-down of the coverage of the Iraq War, along with the News disappearing into courtroom and autopsy room analysis, I don't believe we are that far away from ...
the acceptance of blood and flowers in our society.
|