Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Name one WH policy that can be attributed to the projected job growth...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:53 PM
Original message
Name one WH policy that can be attributed to the projected job growth...
I personally think that the tax cuts haven't done crap to stimulate the economy.

Here's what I would attribute it to: Necessity. Companies are going to grow regardless and despite of policy.

what do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Grim, but ...
... the overly aggressive military policy of the Bushista Regime is obviously stimulating the funerary business in this country.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Worst Job Performance Since The Bureau of Labor Statistics Began
Job recovery still lags far behind

Payroll jobs are now 332,000, or 0.3%, greater than at the start of the recession 47 months ago (March 2001). However, private-sector jobs are still down by 477,000, a contraction of 0.4%. The 809,000 jobs created in the government sector in this time explain the difference between growth in total payroll and private-sector jobs. Overall, this level of creation represents the worst job performance since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began collecting monthly jobs data in 1939 (at the end of the Great Depression). In the three downturns since the early 1970s, the economy had not only recovered all the jobs lost during the recession but had also generated 6.0% more jobs (6.1% more private-sector jobs) than existed at the start of the recession. If this historical standard had prevailed in the private sector, the economy would have 7,282,000 more private-sector jobs today.





http://www.jobwatch.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bush's Missing 11.3 Million Jobs
Comstock Partners, Inc.

Employment Numbers Without the Spin
March 10, 2005

Last Friday the report that February payroll employment increased by a monthly 262,000 was greeted with great enthusiasm by the stock market and most economists. This was the 39th month since the official recession bottom in November 2001. The following is an attempt to put this number into perspective without the spin.

In the previous five expansionary economic cycles the average increase in employment over the first 39 months was 10.1%. In the current cycle the increase is 1.5%.

If employment had climbed by 10.1 % since November 2001, we would have added 13.2 million jobs instead of the 1.9 million actually reported. That’s a difference of 11.3 million jobs.

If we did add 13.2 million jobs on the current cycle, the average monthly increase would have amounted to 338,000. Instead the monthly average increase has been only 50,000, and we have exceeded 300,000 in only three separate months out of the 39.

Snip ....

http://www.comstockfunds.com/screenprint.cfm?newsletterid=1165
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Wow mhr, you're all over it!
thanks!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Unemployed 60 Months - I Live Bush's Hell On Earth Each And Every Day
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B0S0X87 Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. That sucks...
but how exactly did Bush's policies directly cause you to get laid off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. His Tax Cuts For The Wealthy Prevented A Normal Economic Recovery
Edited on Wed Mar-16-05 04:30 PM by mhr
Myself and thousands of other professionals have suffered through a job creation drought - the jobless recovery.

I hold degrees in Electrical Engineering and Business Administration.
I have 15 + years of professional work experience.
I am an honorably discharged Navel Officer.
I am also a FAA certified commercial pilot.

With over 3,000 resumes out the door, I have yet to find suitable employment.

I cannot even find unsuitable employment because of my age and experience.

So, Bush's polices have directly impacted me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, since a lot of transactions are online anymore
I can't see how the tax cuts for the upper 1 percent has helped the "tourism" industry - now that they can just transfer the money electronically and never leave the US to put money in the "offshore accounts" . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Trickle down economics was a joke in the '80s and it's a joke now...
tax cuts schmax cuts, it hasn't helped philanthropy in any way. Unless campiagn contrabutions are considered "philanthropy".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Enlarging government
Most of the full time jobs that have been created are government jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. fast food jobs are also now considered "manufacturing" jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The distortion of language by this administration has become grotesque. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. outsourcing
it has done wonders for foreign job growth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC