Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is the American Media so afraid to tell the truth about 9-11?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 07:27 PM
Original message
Why is the American Media so afraid to tell the truth about 9-11?
- Watching The Learning Channel's special on the official version of 9-11. Like most of the rest of the American media...they've become revisionists... disregarding the most relevant facts about what Bush* was doing and how his administration responded on that day.

- The format of this show consists of interviews and 'flashbacks' from Bush's* staff and remains completely loyal to the official version of events. They don't show Bush* sitting there for over 20 minutes as the hijacking unfolds unimpeded by US defenses. They fail to discuss why no planes were scrambled to intercept the hijacked planes. Not one voice to challenge the official story or present an opposing point of view.

- TLC is not alone. Most if not all of the 'mainstream media' is telling the same story - the 'official' version of events. Which is why the Bushies are now considered 'heroes' to so many Americans.

- Call me a 'conspiracy theorist' if you must...but I sincerely believe the US Media is a 'coconspirator' with the Bush* government in hiding the truth about 9-11. I can't say exactly why they're doing it...but the end result is that they're protecting the Bush* government from liability, responsibility and accountability.

- What's your take on this issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. One word:
Anthrax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think they're a bunch of scared rabbits...
They're afraid that they'll get heat if they tell the truth. Most media outlets are also owned by Rupert Murdoch and other Right Wingers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Watch MSNBC - they've been slamming the Administartion
They've been having 9/11 widows on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fizzana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. If they told the truth no-one would ever trust anything the
government ever did again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. A history lesson on the media's servitude to power:
when Dan Rather viewed the Zapruder film shortly after the assassination, he told the world it showed Kennedy's head being rocked violently forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Cronkite, I believe
I think it was the mid-60s before the film was released to the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. It was definitely Rather
It was his first big break with CBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. They'd get whacked
and the killers would make it look like an accident, suicide, or illness; in other words, they'd get Wellstoned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
protect freedom impeach bush now Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. CBS's Dan Rather told BBC that reporters are too afraid
this is from late Feb or first week in March 2003

---------------------------------------------


CBS's Dan Rather tells BBC reporter Palast that US reporters are too afraid to ask questions

On my BBC television show, Newsnight, an American journalist confessed that, since the 9/11 attacks, U.S. reporters are simply too afraid to ask the uncomfortable questions that could kill careers: "It's an obscene comparison, but there was a time in South Africa when people would put flaming tires around people's necks if they dissented. In some ways, the fear is that you will be neck-laced here, you will have a flaming tire of lack of patriotism put around your neck," Dan Rather said.

Without his makeup, Rather looked drawn, old and defeated in confessing that he too had given in. "It's that fear that keeps journalists from asking the toughest of the tough questions and to continue to bore in on the tough questions so often."

Investigators were ordered to "back off" from any inquiries into Saudi Arabian financing of terror networks....

The reports I did based on this information won the California State University School of Journalism's Project Censored Award in 2002. It's not the kind of prize you want to win -- it's given to crucial stories that were effectively banned from U.S. airwaves and papers.3 I don't want any misunderstanding here, so I must emphasize what we did not find: We uncovered no information, none whatsoever, that George W. Bush had any advance knowledge of the plan to attack the World Trade Center on 9/11, nor, heaven forbid, any involvement in the attack.

FBI Document 199I

What we did discover was serious enough. To begin with, from less-than-happy FBI agents we obtained an interesting document, some 30 pages long, marked "SECRET." I've reproduced a couple of pages here (figure 2.1). Note the designation "199I" -- that's FBI-speak for "national security matter." According to insiders, FBI agents had wanted to check into two members of the bin Laden family, Abdullah and Omar, but were told to stay away by superiors -- until September 13, 2001. By then, Abdullah and Omar were long gone from the United States.

<more>

http://www.gregpalast.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. We need to clone Helen Thomas
"I censored myself for 50 years when I was a reporter," said Thomas, who is now a columnist for Hearst News Service. "Now I wake up and ask myself, 'Who do I hate today?'" Her short list of answers seems not to vary from war, President Bush, timid office-holders, a muffled press and cowed citizens, pretty much in that order.
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/tt/2002/nov06/thomas.html

MS. THOMAS: My follow-up is, why does he want to drop bombs on innocent Iraqis?
http://www.antiwar.com/comment/helen.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying_Pig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. Because, as Paul Krugman said today...
Edited on Thu Sep-11-03 08:13 PM by Flying_Pig
in his Buzzflash interview, the majority of the media are nothing more than government propagandists. They are not allowing the "real story" to get out, nor be discussed. In essence, they are all, the media, the Bush regime, and anyone else (including some Democrats) who were either directly involved in 9/11 (LIHOP or MIHOP), and/or, has kept the truth from the American people, guilty of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, fraud, treason, and crimes against humanity.

This is what we face.... the execution and cover-up of a crime of unbelievable historical and personal implication. Hundreds of millions around the world, either believe they know the truth, or suspect it, and simply cannot beleive that the American people are standing by, letting it happen....in doing so, we are all witting, and unwitting, accomplices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. They won't say anything. They are the unindicted co-conspirators
Corporate media was in on the 911conspiracy from day one just like they were all in on the sElection scam. They give this naked administration it's cover with smoke and mirrors. Today's American corporate media oligopoly can obscure almost all of the sunlight anytime the regime nods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. They won't be promoted and might be fired.
FOX got rid of all liberals.

In our social economic status driven society, who wants to lose their identity, i.e. their job.

They'd have to pick their fights. For now, they seem to be choosing not to fight at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindashaw Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. On MSNBC, an interesting thing just happened...
Not about 9/11, but about their up-coming coverage of the election. They have their own MSNBC commercial, and at the end of it, they said, "Al Gore got the most votes, and he lost." Haven't heard that in awhile from the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
13. Good article on unanswered questions about 9/11
Edited on Fri Sep-12-03 08:09 AM by Snellius
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC