Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question for Union Members

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 09:54 AM
Original message
Question for Union Members
What is a "payroll check off for union dues?" Does it mean that union dues are deducted from an employees check? If so, is it voluntary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. unions in calif and right to work states.
The right wing has fought to make union dues voluntary in many states and thus to weaken them. Many will choose to get the benefits of the union without paying for it. While I think unions are a necessary evil, they have never been more necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Please explain how Unions are a "neccessary evil" ?
I see them as one of the few democratizing forces in favor of people. Without them, otherwise powerless people are at the mercy of corporate abuse.

Read about the history of labor in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Another Bill C. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Unions an evil?
I don't understand why unions are a necessary "evil." Unions (and the fear of them) are the mechanism that, for a while, got a living wage, decent hours, and benefits for American workers.

If anyone believes that employers began voluntarily paying living wages, supporting pension plans, providing vacation time and sick leave, providing health insurance, paying overtime, etc., I'll bet they stay up for Easter Bunny, too.

With the decline of union power, we've lost a lot of those benefits. Now overtime pay is on the blocks. Our middle class is shrinking and we're on our way to a "lords and serfs" economy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. It is voluntary here and other
"right to work(for less) states. In Illinois and a few other states, if a place is a Union shop, it is mandatory that a person join the Union after the probationary period is up. Unions help to build a better America by giving workers a voice. It is not socialism as some would have us believe. This country was made great by the blood, sweat and tears of the working men and women. Ok Ok, I'll get off my soapbox now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, dues check off means you can "check off" the box
that says deduct the dues from your check. You do not have to pay dues through payroll deduction. You can pay "cash dues" on a monthly, yearly, etc. basis. The preferred method is by payroll deduction. Most, if not all, unions allow for cash dues but the practice is discouraged.

Why check off is important is because collecting cash dues from everyone every month is very tough. You start getting the "I'll pay you next week" stuff or "I don't have it right now", etc. This leads to a lot of disunity and discord within the members. Payroll deduction gives you a feeling of "if you don't see it, you don't miss it".

Stopping dues deduction is a fundamental part of union busting.

If your question is in regards to if someone must pay some sort of union dues by deduction or cash dues, then the answer is that it depends on if your state is a "right to work" state. In a non-right to work state you must pay at leat the cost of basic union representation as a form of dues. This is not the same as paying full dues. It's something less.

And, FYI, "right to work" is a right wing euphenism for not being required to pay union dues. It's often referred to as "right to work for less".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Well
I thought it was referred to as "right to fire".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. Even if optional there may be obligatory costs.
In Mn, were I was represented by the state colleges and universities union, "dues" were optional, however the "fair share" contribution to bargaining was obligatory.

The fair share was almost equal to the union dues.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks!
Thanks for the clarifications. I really appreciate the prompt and thorough answers. The question came up on a survey of city council candidates for a campaign I'm helping with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Your candidate MUST state he's in favor of dues check off for
municipal employees to stay in the running to get endorsed. Dues check off is a very fundamental labor issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Not a given
We're in NC. In case that doesn't say enough, what that means is that union endorsements don't cary a lot of weight here. Workers here seem to enjoy getting shafted: "It's good for Bidness." Our local economy was built on luring textile and manufacturing jobs from the NE with promise of cheaper labor -- and it worked for a while, but now it's all going to shit (which is to say China).

I think my guy is going to favor it. I'm certainly going to make the case that he should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. How about this question.......Why doesn't the Federal gov't allow you...
to check-off a box on your IRS form to allow you to pay your income-tax at the end of the year??

Would they ever allow that? Why not? Isn't there a correlation between allowing that and the Union Dues check-off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC