Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anybody know the legitimacy of some of the Iraqi blogs?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
T Roosevelt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 07:34 PM
Original message
Does anybody know the legitimacy of some of the Iraqi blogs?
There's a bunch out there, and I've seen a number referenced that are either all good news (pointed to by my pro-war friends) and mostly bad news. Here are two:

http://healingiraq.blogspot.com (links to the CPA website...hmmm)
http://iraqthemodel.blogspot.com (anybody that links to lucianne and lgf is suspect)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dunno about those two.
I'd be more concerned about objectivity. I'm not sure what "legitimate" means--believed? accurate? actually run by an Iraqi?

Many blogs widely cited here serve to reinforce the beliefs of those doing the citing. Same on the other side. One serious problem is forgetting that people (even Iraqis) have agendas. Another is to forget that conditions aren't uniform, even within a city. I lived in West LA, a decent neighborhood; 3 miles in another direction was an area that makes Beverly Hills look like a slum, and 6 in another direction was pretty much a slum. By some thinking, that's just wasn't possible.

There's no requirement for a blogger to not have an agenda. Take those into account. Somebody advocating for the insurgency, knowing that there's no way to disconfirm his story, is unlikely to be greatly fettered by the truth. An Army site, for the same reason, is also not to be taken at face value.

Find an objective one (to which I say, Good luck!). Or read both kinds and realize the truth is likely to be in between. Somewhere. Probably.

"Skepticism serves our interests best."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Roosevelt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. My concern was backing/sponsorship by CPA/US interests
and I understand that objectivity is difficult to find, particularly in blogs.

So yes, the truth is somewhere in between...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah, that's a problem. But sponsorship by US interests
merely implies an agenda.

Pick a few with competing agendas and make some guesses. It's bound to be better than somebody who just reads blogs with one agenda.

(Back in the '70s and '80s I read US papers, and Izvestiya and other Soviet papers. Sometimes it was hard to figure out if I was reading papers from the same planet.).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC