If you had to, would you vote for...

[ZombieNixon]

Poll question: If you had to, would you vote for...

[Osamasux]

1. Is he/she pro recognized unions?

[noamnety]

2. I refuse to select a group to persecute (nt)

[Stop_the_War]

3. Oh my, this is really a tricky one!!

I voted for the pro-lifer who supports gay marriage simply because I would never vote for an "anti-gay marriage crusader". hell no. I'm pro-choice by the way. I had to pick something. I really hate polls like this.

[ZombieNixon]

5. Which is exactly why I post them from time to time.

:evilgrin:

[Jack_DeLeon]

4. I vote for choice 2...

Someone who is pro-choice is alot more likely to win than someone who supports gay marriage.

[w13rd0]

6. Not if the candidate is running a true...

..."Sanctity of Life" campaign. They'd have to be "true" pro-life though...anti-war, anti-death penalty, pro-people loving each other...

[Jack_DeLeon]

10. I dont think such a candidate...

would do very well.

[RoyGBiv]

7. "Crusader"

The word "crusader" gives me pause. Somehow I think anti-gay marriage "crusaders" and pro-choice people are mutually exclusive, but maybe not.

Anyway, without considering all the ramifications of what a "crusader" would do, I'd vote for choice 2 with a clear conscience. The reason is simply that I don't think endorsing marriage should be a function of the government in any sense.

[ZombieNixon]

9. I couldn't think of an alternate term,

since "anti-gay-marriager" isn't a word. I agree, it's bad wording, but for lack of anything else, I went with it...

[sandnsea]

8. Pro gay marriage

There's plenty of pro-choice people to support that cause.

[jdots]

11. Monty whats behind door # 3 ?

I'l go with Vlad the Impaler for 6 points

[ZombieNixon]

12. LOL