Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AAR reporting Michael Chertoff lied under oath................

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 09:20 AM
Original message
AAR reporting Michael Chertoff lied under oath................
at Senate confirmation hearing..
about the John Walker Lind case.. Whistleblower on now..
Why nothing on media-R-us? (Not being offered enough graft apparently)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ktowntennesseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Lying, under oath or otherwise, is so common place for this bunch,
that the media ignores it. Same old story, nothing new, "nothing to see here, folks."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Acryliccalico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yea ! MSM thinks lying is NORMAL!!!!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Actually, lying under oath is a big thing for conservatives.
All you have to do is search the 90s to locate records of what they had to say about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imax2268 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. any links yet...?
Isn't that funny...the conservanazis always like to say that Clinton lied under oath when you bring up the fact that BushCo lied about WMD...

If this story has any merit...let's see how they react now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. 'conservanazi' --- I ike that much more than 'neocon'
a more self-explanatory title

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here's a link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC