Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"After Fallujah, How 'Bout Making The US Safe?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 04:02 AM
Original message
"After Fallujah, How 'Bout Making The US Safe?"
Edited on Tue Dec-28-04 04:34 AM by Bluebear
by The Boyd Group - Aviation consulting and forecasting

The show goes on, friends. Yep, we can kick tush in Fallujah, Mosul, and a bunch of other places that have yet to discover indoor plumbing, but in that vast TV-Wasteland spreading roughly from Eastport, Maine, to San Diego, the terrorists could - if and when they wanted - have their way with us.

This past week, we've had more proof that the pack of clowns running Homeland Security couldn't protect this country from a enraged pack of Cub Scouts on a sugar-high. We'll leave out the incidents of security screening failures - they're becoming too common to bother with. It's a proven, incontrovertible fact that the quality of US airport screening is running on empty. But that's just the symptom of a major security disease. It's called complacency, with a high degree of political sleaze......(snip, examples)

Let's say it again: This entire Homeland Security system is a misfire. Somebody's going to get killed because losers like the FSD at Newark, not to mention a herd of other connected bozos, are running the show. Republicans say the right things (like, Mica calling the TSA a Soviet-style bureaucracy) but then hypocritically do nothing. Democrats eagerly cheer on the nincompoops running HSA and TSA, and want to pay them more for their "hard work."

The only reason we've not had another major attack - on aviation or any of our other infrastructure - is that terrorists haven't wanted to. Or, probably more correctly, aren't ready.

Yet.

http://www.aviationplanning.com/asrc1.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. They should seal off the cockpit from the rest of the plane.
That would provide real security.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerOstrich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I've been saying that for years....I didn't know anyone
else agreed. My thought is have a pilots entrance into the cockpit which is completely sealed off (they would have to take what is now part of first class to have a bathroom and a place to make coffee etc).

The second entrance is into the passenger part of the plane. Once the plane is in the air the only way to the cockpit is outside through the door.

Wow....I can't believe someone said it!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC