Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

VERIZON VILLAINY | hang on to your jaw! | Ctr. for American Progress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 12:03 PM
Original message
VERIZON VILLAINY | hang on to your jaw! | Ctr. for American Progress
Edited on Tue Nov-30-04 12:05 PM by nostamj
from the ALWAYS excellent daily e-brief! (sign up here: www.americanprogress.org sorry I couldn't capture the links that were in the email. but, they're all on the site.)


CORPORATE POWER
Verizon's Villainy

In an attempt to bridge the digital divide and enhance their economic prospects, cities across the nation, including Milwaukee, Cleveland, St. Louis and Philadelphia, are planning to deploy universal low-cost wireless Internet access. Meanwhile, moneyed telecommunications corporations and their army of lobbyists are doing everything in their power to ensure it doesn't happen. In Pennsylvania, for example, the legislature passed a bill with a deeply buried provision – inserted after intensive lobbying by Verizon Communications – which would make it illegal for any city or other "political subdivision" in the state to provide low-cost Internet access to its citizens unless a corporation like Verizon gave them permission. Gov. Ed Rendell has until midnight tonight to sign or veto the legislation. Email Gov. Rendell and tell him he should stand up to corporate lobbyists and veto the bill.

VERIZON'S OFFENSIVE PUBLIC RELATIONS OFFENSIVE: Eager to squelch what is quickly becoming a public relations disaster, Verizon said yesterday that it is considering allowing Philadelphia to deploy its wireless network even if the bill is signed into law. This is a transparent effort to tamp down the controversy while still enabling the company to "handcuff other cities and towns in Pennsylvania." For example, a Verizon representative refused to say whether the company would allow the town of Kutztown, PA to go ahead with plans to offer broadband Internet access over wires. More broadly, the citizens of Pennsylvania – not multinational corporations – should be in charge of their government.

THE $3 BILLION CORPORATE GIVEAWAY: The language restricting cities from providing low-cost Internet access was a just a small provision in "a 30-page bill drafted by industry lobbyists." While restricting competition, the bill provides massive giveaways for telecommunication companies to roll out broadband networks. These provisions are worth as much as $3 billion to Verizon alone.

THE BROAD EFFORT TO KILL LOW-COST INTERNET ACCESS: The movement to restrict low-cost broadband Internet access are not limited to Verizon's efforts in Pennsylvania. Earlier this year, BellSouth and Qwest Communications pushed for "severe restrictions on municipal broadband service in Louisiana and Utah." (For more on these corporations' cynical efforts to limit low-cost wireless internet access, check out freepress.net.)

CORPORATE BROADBAND ACCESS LEAVES MIDDLE CLASS BEHIND: Broadband Internet access is "destined to become this century's basic infrastructure – what highways, water systems and power grids were to the last century's development." But corporate control of broadband development has excluded most of the middle class. Among those living in households earning $150,000 and above, nearly 60 percent have broadband Internet access. But among those living in households earning between $25,000 and $34,999, just 13.4 percent have broadband access. Barbara Grant, a spokeswoman for Philadelphia Mayor John F. Street, said the city's efforts were intended "to bridge the digital divide for residents who wouldn't have access to the Internet, particularly school children."

MUNICIPAL INTERNET ACCESS IS COST EFFECTIVE: In Philadelphia, planners estimate that offering city-wide wireless Internet access will cost taxpayers $10 million to set up and $1.5 million a year to operate. Commercial broadband access provided by companies like Verizon typically costs from $35 to $60 a month. That means if Verizon were to provide broadband access to all 590,000 Philly households, it would charge at least $247 million a year.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Actually
I believe the law only bans the city from charging for resale of WIFI/broadband access, which is a whole nother ball of wax than a ban on providing WIFI access.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Easy Enough To Get Around Either Way.
You don't sell the service, you rent-out the equipment. It's kind of like garbage service in my city. We don't pay for the service we just buy the bags.

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. another example of industries writing laws--ie. the pharaceutical comp!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. the people who voted for VALUES
have enabled this. they are safe from GAY MARRIAGE but have sold out to corporate fascists...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wow
Who would ever imagine that a huge multi-national corporation would not have the best interests of the consumers at heart?

Now, I personally hate Verizon with a passion. Their cellular phone people have screwed me over more times than I have the time to tell you about.

Here is an example of someone else's complaint about Verizon's customer Service:
http://strangewomenlyinginponds.typepad.com/strange_women_lying_in_po/2004/08/hey_verizon_wir.html



In addition to being huge contributors to Bush's campaign and closely tied to his mis-administration:
Verizon and Bush

Verizon is guilty of many, many things that piss liberals off.

Now, here is the good part. They've also pissed-off many right-wing freeper wingnut repugs, too.

We have to make sure we broadcast the right messages to the right audiences.

So, when talking to the Reich Wing about Verizon, use:
Verizon is anti-father
http://hisside.com/verizon_campaign.htm#action


Jewish Community to Boycott Verizon Superpages
http://www.vault.com/community/mb/getmessage.jsp?message_id=1241533&tidx=1
Verizon Yellow pages Manager makes anitsemetic remarks about Boro Park, and Verizon covers it up.


Verizon is anti-gun
Boycott Verizon!
Anti-gun company fires employees it deems insufficiently helpless
http://www.gbronline.com/cwb/samizdat/boycott.html


Verizon sends American jobs overseas
http://www.computerworld.com/managementtopics/outsourcing/story/0,10801,82578,00.html
http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid7_gci1017935,00.html

Again, every time you think about who you're talking to, ask yourself, "What can I tell them about Verizon that would piss them off?"

The same thing works for other topics. "What can I tell them about Bush that would piss them off?"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cygy2k Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Verizon not all bad
I am the biggest Dem but you can't just single Verizon out for being a capitalist corporation. One thing that people forget is that corporations are in business to make money for a service they provide. They are not a non-profit organization. Anybody that has worked as a small business owner dreams of being as big as Verizon and would do the same things Verizon has done to protect that dream. Just a thought for all the big-corporation haters out there. Without them, we wouldn't have good cellular coverage, small companies just can't provide that.

Just a thought......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galadrium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree. Verison has great coverage and good customer support
I will support them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "I can hear you now"
Seriously, I have to agree with you. Verizon's coverage and customer support are very good, and I bought into a great package with lots 'o' hours and roaming included.

I long for the days before deregulation in many, many areas. But since we have to deal with the broken telecom infrastructure, and how it is being rebuilt by these individual companies, I gotta put my money where the service is.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC