|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
UdoKier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 01:47 AM Original message |
Poll question: Does the leadership of the GOP REALLY intend to ban abortion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntPatsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 01:50 AM Response to Original message |
1. Sure they would, why would they care? For the down trodden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 01:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. I don't think so. You're assuming they're honest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntPatsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 02:00 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Honesty has nothing to do with it? Abortionists have been around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 01:50 AM Response to Original message |
2. abortions AND birth control |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 01:52 AM Response to Original message |
3. If they want to ban it so bad, why don't they ever actually try to ban it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
serryjw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 02:00 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Its' gone already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 02:05 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Good point. It's not as accessible as it should be, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
serryjw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 02:40 AM Response to Reply #14 |
20. F*CK NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 01:52 AM Response to Original message |
4. I voted "no," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 01:53 AM Response to Original message |
5. Not yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntPatsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 02:01 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. They have plenty of other issues to play with a few more years.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Denver Socialist (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 01:55 AM Response to Original message |
7. Their favorite wedge issue will be obsolete soon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 01:58 AM Response to Original message |
8. They're just using the fundies. They are authoritarian fascists, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 02:03 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Good point. Their litmus tests for judges are NOT about abortion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 02:05 AM Response to Original message |
13. Wouldn't it be political suicide -- ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wapsie B (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 02:06 AM Response to Original message |
15. I voted No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 02:08 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Seems to me they like to pass limitations that'll be overturned by courts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lexingtonian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 02:09 AM Response to Original message |
17. They don't really care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
booley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 02:11 AM Response to Original message |
18. Both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 02:13 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. But how do you mobilize fundy voters with criminal boogeymen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
booley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 11:28 AM Response to Reply #19 |
32. they didn't need it for drugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodHelpUsAll2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 02:53 AM Response to Original message |
21. I voted no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 03:33 AM Response to Original message |
22. I voted no but they *will* overturn it ....... for now. Here's their game: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 04:17 AM Response to Original message |
23. Not a snowball's chance in hell... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ima (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 04:34 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. I believe they will do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renaissanceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 04:31 AM Response to Original message |
24. I think we should change the topic in Washington |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 04:08 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. Hi renaissanceguy!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Piperay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 04:54 AM Response to Original message |
26. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bklyncowgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 07:40 AM Response to Original message |
27. Some may be honest abortion opponents but most are using the issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bklyncowgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 07:40 AM Response to Original message |
28. Some may be honest abortion opponents but most are using the issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shesemsmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
29. nope they wont do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
30. They just don't want to okay FUNDS for it.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hollowdweller (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-21-04 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
31. I don't think they really want to ban it but I think that the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC