I was just reading an article by Clark at the WP, defending Fallujah, regrettably, but still explaining its necessity. Only in the future will we know how many we have killed, maimed, and how much damage has been done to our country's image and soul.
We should be saying, our Democrats, Fallujah is just wrong.http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/199290_thomas12.htmlSNIP..."WASHINGTON --
Do Americans of good conscience really believe that we are making the United States more secure by bombing and killing the people of Fallujah?That's the justification President Bush and his hawkish circle have given for their brutal offensive against the Sunni stronghold as they push ahead for the total military occupation of Iraq.
Why are we killing Iraqis in their own country? And why are our forces being killed?
Of course it was convenient and the better part of valor for the president to wait until after the election to start dropping the 500-pound bombs on Fallujah as well as raking the streets with artillery and aircraft firepower.
Bush, who has never been in war, flaunted his commander in chief status during the campaign. But clearly he did not want to put it to the test at Fallujah before Election Day. Had he done so, the president would have had to explain why he took the United States into Iraq and why he was targeting innocent Iraqis...."
SNIP...
"The silence of the Democrats is playing into the president's hands. As was the case with the original October 2002 congressional resolution authorizing war, Democrats are unsure of themselves and therefore unwilling to challenge the president....."