|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
maggrwaggr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:25 PM Original message |
who thinks if Bush "wins" in '04 our military might stage a coup? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. Nah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. How horrific? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maggrwaggr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Nuclear strike on North Korea. That might do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenm (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
2. military coup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saline (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. It's incredible... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bryant69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
4. I don't buy it either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
5. Instead of a coup why doesn't the military simply vote! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kamika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
6. Doubt it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DealsGapRider (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. This post reflects... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
8. I doubt a military coup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spotbird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
9. To avoid that possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Philosophy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 07:48 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mlawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
10. Interesting question. But: will the military still vote repuke?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maggrwaggr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I don't think the military will vote for W. this time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mlawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:54 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. I hope you are right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goobergunch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:43 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Didn't I hear something about troops voting electronically in 2004? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
12. Nahh, the military would never attack US civilians. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBigGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
16. I dont think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
17. No but if he loses.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kodi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
19. soldiers dont man factories, nor grow crops, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
21. Personally, I think they'll defeat him with absentee ballots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iangb (444 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
22. By Nov '04 any Pentagon dissidents.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobertFrancisK (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
23. Some people here would support Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-02-03 10:26 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Your post makes no sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 17th 2024, 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC