one that I have asked before. I believe that it is a committee decision. They need to be lobbied, I suppose.
Here is something interesting I just stumbled upon:
At the request of the Democratic National Committee, the U.S. Supreme Court on March 27 let stand a lower court ruling gutting the Voting Rights Act of 1965, affirming that the DNC is not subject to the Act, but can function as a ``private club.'' The case was brought by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. and voters from Virginia, Louisiana, Texas, and Arizona in 1996, after Donald Fowler, then DNC chairman, ordered state Democratic parties to ``disregard'' votes cast for LaRouche in the Presidential primaries and caucuses, without first obtaining pre-clearance by the U.S. Department of Justice, as required by the Voting Rights Act.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court ignored the following amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief filed by former Congressman James Mann on behalf of more than 60 prominent Democratic Party officials and prominent members, who urged the court to back LaRouche's position.
For more information on the case, see ``LaRouche Takes Voting Rights Case to U.S. Supreme Court,'' EIR, Feb. 18, 2000, and Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., ``U.S.A. v. Lyndon LaRouche: He's a Bad Guy, But We Can't Say Why,'' EIR, March 10, 2000.
http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac/amicus.htm