I believe there may be another reason why Bush,Cheney and

[Professor_Moriarty]

Rumsfeld wanted to suppress a full investigation of the air quality near Ground Zero.A detailed air quality monitoring would have disclosed the presence of explosives used to bring down the towers from the inside and many questions would be raised about the "official" story line.I think that may very well be the reason that all the steel was shipped out to India and China very quickly too. Any one have any thoughts?

[maxpower]

1. Good Points

I always wondered why they were so quick to dispose of the evidence at ground zero.

[soothsayer]

2. Verrrry interesting. Could well be. n/t

[Spinzonner]

3. Yes, there is no evidence to support the theory that the towers

were brought down by explosives (other than exploding jet feul) and both data and theory are sufficient to support the explanation that they were brought down by the effects of the airplane collisions, jet feul explosion, and subsequent fires.

They oppose all inquiries reflexively to avoid answering any questions, in this case why the adminsitration lied in the days after 9/11/01 about the air quality near ground zero.

[Professor_Moriarty]

4. If we had detailed air quality monitoring that whole idea could have been

put to rest.Now we will have to speculate whether or not explosives were involved. To me when a government agency that is charged with doing this kind of work is being prevented from doing so, it sends a signal that something is afoot as my adversary Sherlock Holmes would say.

[Spinzonner]

5. Explosives were not necessary to cause the towers' collapses

they are merely conjured up to justify a conspiracy theory that goes beyond the facts and has a political motive.

[Professor_Moriarty]

6. I never said explosives were necessary but that we could have ruled them

out if we had monitored air quality and examined the steel supports after they had collapsed. It seems to me that should have been the very least that should have been investigated and the EPA is fully capable of doing so.In a disaster of this magnitude, it does no one any good to be close minded and say we know how they were brought down.What is wrong with another piece of evidence when we have agencies charged to do just that kind of work?

[Professor_Moriarty]

7. There are two other issues related to this.

The first is that all the evidence from the plane crashes in PA and the Pentagon are missing.Especially the black boxes and the Cockpit Voice Recorders.Three years after the fact the NTSB investigations reports have not been released.I have not seen any pictures of bodies of dead or wounded passengers from these planes.

I don't know what to make of all these things.First these are unusual and taken along with the suppression of the air quality reports and the metallurgical investigations of the steel spports at WTC, something is not quite right in Denmark.