|
As a fellow grad student, I understand your concerns. I'll have a significant chunk of debt under my belt when I graduate and not be able to pay it back for probably another decade. As an American I value my rights, liberties, and freedoms, and their erosion under any administration is painful. The economic situation right now is not pleasent, but it *is* improving though probably for different reasons than most political analysts would care to admit (then again the whole cause of this mess is in that category too).
Class is not what this election is about. This is about power, and class is a convenient way for people who want power to distract from what they want to do with it. Kerry wants to spend enough to generate a deficit running at $900 billion for 2005 alone. Basic math: in order to pay for something, you need money. That money is going to come from you and me, not from the exceptionally wealthy like George Soros who are bankrolling the election. Remember, the three wealthiest Senators have more money than the other 97 put together, and if memory serves the top 3 are all Democrats (Kerry is at top of list).
Yeah, rich people keep a lot of their money. But they also pay over half the taxes in this country. How about we get rid of the IRS and move to the FairTax plan? I'd rather keep all of my (miniscule) cash from my summer job and pay for it with capital purchases later on: it's more fair to the populace at large and you pay in taxes what you demand in goods and sevices.
I do not know what state you are in, but in the South things work a bit differently than at the federal level. The "Red Clay" Democrats of Georgia are a great example, they would likely be deemed Republicans in most states and probably deemed "hard-liners" in California and the Northeast. They support the 2nd amendment enough to still allow people to carry concealed weapons and purchsae firearms at gun shows. They support a balanced budget. They also support the military to a great extent, probably because of the multitiude of DOD facilities here.
Personally I find people like Senator Clinton and Senator Santorum to be examples of more extreme versions of the Left and Right. One seems to want to *socialize* medicine, expand government power, concentrate authority into one office, and seems to have a severe problem with people that do not agree with the policies espoused, never mind a long memory. The other seems to cite religious reasons for quite a few bits of legislation, actually tried to get Congress to cite a religious alternative to evolution as something available for education in a public school science classroom, and seems to think that the nation should conform to the narrow moral spectrum of *fundamentalist Protestant* christianity. Both of these people seem to want power for the sake of molding the nation to their personal vision without much care about what other people hold to be the values of this nation and might be tempted to discourage those who would think otherwise.
So what do you propose to do, Kyle? How would you solve the problem?
|