FAUX : Al Qaeda Planning Spectacular Pre-Election Attack !

[NightOwwl]

Even more spectacular than 9/11!

Be on alert until after the convention, possibly until the election!

Chilling! Car bombs! Terror! Explosives! Al Qaeda! Suicide bombers! Repeat words every few sentences.

And what is with that huge "War On Terror" background they use on the set? Like their 24/7 coverage isn't enough?

As usual, DU'ers were way ahead everyone else. The alert will be kept on high until very close to the election. Librul media will fear-monger, then right before the election the administration will announce they have thwarted the *cough* attack *cough*.

And what is our "fearless leader" doing? Why, he's coming back from vacation and getting right back on the campaign trail. Good job, Georgie!

[louis-t]

1. And what is our "fearless leader" doing?

fishing.

[johnfunk]

17. Coming to FAUX News Channel: "Fishing with Smirk!"

John Lurie, move over! Each week, popular wartime preznit Smirk W. McBunnypants goes fishing with a different conservative celebrity -- from his daughter Paris... er, Jenna, to Iraqi freedom fighter and currency traitor... er trader Ahmed Chalabi, to disgraced adulter... er, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich! Guaranettd quieter than The O'Reilly Factor and five times dumber!

[MikeG]

2. This relation between the election and an Al Qaeda attack is too fishy.

Why must the two be related?

[Cha]

5. Because fauxsux is but One of the current American government's

propoganda machines. And if faux says there's going to be a terrorist plot against the election..you better believe the goverment told them to say that.

[acmavm]

3. All that tells me is that this administration is doing a really piss poor

job.

[kentuck]

4. If it doesn't happen then...

our Great Leader has prevented it with his Spectacular leadership...
They don't really think it will happen - Dubya will prevent it.

[MoonRiver]

6. That sound very

faux! :D

[ItsMyParty]

7. There will not be sophosticated attacks like 9/11

That happened because we were asleep. They will not be able to do that again without mega years of planning and sleuth, if ever. Any attacks are the car bomb, suicide bomber types. Welcome to the world the rest of the planet has been living in for ages. Those type of attacks do not shut down governments, etc. They, unfortunately, are in the same category as highway accidents, drownings, etc. We never put anything in perspective in this country. We always hype, hype, hype and look like positive fools to the rest of the world because of it.

[Bluebear]

8. Exclusive photo: BUSH REACTS TO NEWS!

[iconoclastic cat]

19. :

:puke:

[Cat Atomic]

9. I hope this country really is as polarized as they say.

And I hope every chickenshit Republican stays home on November 2nd, glued to Fox News, with duct tape around their doors.

[Ishoutandscream]

10. LOL!!! That would be priceless!

nt

[indepat]

16. And arses

[NightOwwl]

11. The medias outrageous reporting could turn out to be beneficial.

By telling us an attack may be imminent, then following up with a "heart-warming story" about Bush and Jenna's big fish, the Fox-flip-flopping might cause people to become more cynical than they already are.

And it may get better when Bushboy starts campaigning again. He'll be using his trademark "amurika is safer" slogan, and all the while the news is constantly reporting on Al Qaeda's plan to attack America.

Doofus.

[walldude]

12. Of the nature of a spectacle; impressive or sensational

Thats the definition of Spectacular at dictionary.com. I love the words they choose, like this is going to be something really cool... Gee you think they could have chosen words like horrible, terrible, awful, something of that nature. Of course they don't want those words associated with the Shrub do they...

[ItsMyParty]

13. walldude---they use "spectacular" because that it what it would

be to THEM. They are so wanting it that bin Laden could recruit one of them to do it!!!

[NightOwwl]

14. I've never understood the media's use of the word

spectacular. A spectacular event is something one would want to be a part of. I don't think planes flying into the World Trade Center qualifies.

Catastrophic, definitely. Spectacular, no way.

[AntiCoup2K4]

15. But it WAS spectacular for them....

Look at how much fascist bullshit they have gotten away with just from the image of one airplane hitting a building

http://www.waterville.wednet.edu/cliparts,wallpaper,andanimatedgifs/Sept11-Pics/WTC/Plane2.jpg


That one picture was all they needed to sell the bullshit official story, and all the Fourth Reich crap that followed it.

It doesn't matter that we only have about 2 seconds of footage of the first crash, with no way of knowing exactly what hit the first tower (though my eyes didn't judge the object as having the wingspan anywhere near a 757)

It doesn't matter that the initial explosion at the Pentagon produced a hole only 16 feet wide and could not have possibly accomodated even the body of a Boeing jet, let alone the wings.

It doesn't matter that they concocted a story about Flight 93 that sounds like a made for TV movie, rather than admit they shot a plane out of the sky that they believed was headed for the White House.

The image of that second plane (which may or may not have had passengers on it - or missiles - )hitting the tower sold the rest. And millions who can't imagine that their "God endorsed" leader would lie to them are still buying it.

In that sense, it WAS spectacular. The most spectacular fraud - and mass murder- ever committed on US soil.

[Sabriel]

18. Uh, is that THIS election or 2000?

It's hard to tell what they mean anymore.