Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How much time should Lynndie England get?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:14 PM
Original message
Poll question: How much time should Lynndie England get?
She is the one who was in all the photos giving thumbs up from Iraq prison. She is on trial now, and is facing maximum of 38 years. The trial is not looking good for her, most recent story has prisoners fingering her as the one who abused them.

One of the other prison guards, who was a male got one year in prison for his part.

That is some background. How much time should she get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. First of all, she is a sex offender. Secondly, the more time she's facing,
the better chance that she'll start spouting names of higher-ups who put her up to these crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. You needed another category.
"Not one hour more than the males involved." That's what I would have voted for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thank you!
I am pretty sick of Lynnie England taking the fall for everyone involved, including those at the top.

There is a strong, anti-woman political agenda at work here.

She's guilty, but no more so than any of the others who took part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Are the others facing time for "promiscuity"?
Or is she the only one being tagged with this label? I bet she is the only one, and it stinks. Those bastards won't even run DNA profiles to find female soldiers' rapists when they have the evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_DeLeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Interesting question...
Just to be devils advocate, I dont really care if other people that I dont know are promiscious or not.

Lets say it was true that all the male soldiers in that unit were having sex with her.

To be promiscious you have to have multiple partners and whatnot.

Therefore she had multiple partners so she was being promiscious.

However the male soliders only had one partner, therfore they werent being promiscious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. If they were passing her around and they knew she
was with the other soldiers and they had sex with her anyway, I'd consider that as qualifying for participating in promiscuous acts. Besides, I bet she wasn't the only woman around, and I wonder if the other men were investigated for multiple sex partners.

But your point is well-made, and frankly, I don't care what they are doing either. For all I know, getting pregnant might be the safest thing a woman can do there to protect herself from potential IED's or rape by being sent home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Osama_Bin_Winnin Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
39. rest assured
we'll have enough left for the guys when they make it to trial. Especially Grener.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Great. Why haven't they made it to trial yet?
It seems they should all have been there rather obviously. I don't understand. Or,is it that we aren't getting the truth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. How about: "Not one hour more than the Generals involved"?
(and Rumsfeld, of course.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. That would work too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. 1/4 of what the carbs get....cheney, ashcroft, rumsfeld, bush,,,and rice
and powell.....not who was the s for...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. She shouldn't serve a day more than those 5 do.
Not a day more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rick in Maryland Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Probation? She is being tried by the military. There is no probation
in the military.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think those soldiers did irreparable harm to US image and they need
to be held accountable. US Soldiers are Ambassadors at large and they need to act accordingly. A message needs to be sent. Not only about Private Lynndie but all US personel who participated in such acts. The Maximum Sentence and no less is acceptable. Bush* and Rummy should also be held accountable but that probably will not ever happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. How about a couple months of the same treatment she doled out?
After all, they were just having fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. That's right, find a few guys willing to "blow off steam" in her direction
Maybe some fraternity types, ala Rush, could do the trick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Other
IMO, we ought to have a trial first, and determine what exactly (if anything) she is guilty of before deciding on the sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wow, some pretty harsh sentences in votes
Surprised me some, second place is the maximum 38 years and first place is 6- 10 years.

And even one for Death penalty, whoa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. Isn't Lyndie England essentially a rapist?
Forcing people to perform sexual acts against their will is still considered rape, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I don't think so
I think it's sexual assault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
45. depends what the sexual acts were
if you force someone to give someone else oral sex then that's rape - atleast it is here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Apparently the Armed Forces doesn't seem
to take rape seriously even when it's one of their own. Why would it be any different in this case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. How about her "baby daddy"?
That asshole needs to go down too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. Why do we only hear about Lynndie England?
There were alot of other military and civilian personnel involved in this. Not to mention the higher ups, possibly up to Rumsfeld and Bush.

And yet all we hear about is our little Nazi Rosie the Riveter. Why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_DeLeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. She = Scapegoat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. She is the one in the photos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. There are others in the photos. That creep who sits on top
of the Iraqi pyramid, for instance. That's probably the most famous image with a soldier in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zing Zing Zingbah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. Who's voting for the death penalty?
That's a little extreme, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_DeLeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. not necessarily...
Depends on thier viewpoint...

Most people agree that deadly force should be used to stop crimes such as rape or sexual assault.

So its not that much of a stretch for some to think that a fair punishment for the above crimes is death.

Or you could be from the middle east where the death penalty is the norm for many crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Not necesarily?
IMO, it's pretty radical to call for DP before the trial has even begun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_DeLeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 03:38 PM
Original message
well whenever there is one of these polls
I just assume that the poll maker meant after the trial was over and she is convicted of everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
52. Yeah, I voted DP.
I'm actually for a moratorium on the DP. And I'm pretty much against the concept, except in extreme cases, such as crimes against humanity.

If you follow my posts, you'll also notice I'm a firm believer in the presumption of innocence. Although, I draw the exception in cases where there's actual video or photographs of people committing the crime. If England is found not guilty it would be an obvious injustice.

Frankly, I think England deserves the DP just as much as the guards at Auschwitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiLempa Donating Member (736 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
25. 10%
Ms. Englund's sentence should be 10% of what the commanding officers get. Of course she should not be imprisoned in a military brig, rather she should have access to counseling and education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
26. At least seven years






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
27. She should be tried by the ICC.
As should all the participants and the co-conspirators who sent them there to give the Iraqis "democracy" at gunpoint with the aid of torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. How about Feith, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Bush, et al?
How much time should they get? Let's not take Rove's bait by pretending that a few sergeants from out in the boonies are responsible for an atrocity that was ordered by the people at the very top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Gen. Sanchez and Miller and...
Feith, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Bush. All of them are accountable.

I wonder if big press will be made of the other female, the one with thumb up over a detainee that was beaten to death?

The US has committed many War Crimes. A Cover Up is in full force!

Rumsfailed Admitted violating Geneva Convention

Rumsfailed admitted in public that when CIA Tentet requested that a prisoner be sent to a secret Afghan/US Prison that Rumsfailed did so. After four months a DOD Attorney stated that this was an illegal act so Rumsfailed ordered that this prisoner be sent back to Abu Graib but the prisoner was not listed at that location on purpose. That is two violations of the Geneva Convention. Tenet and Rumsfailed violated the Geneva convention, thereby also The Constitution of the USA. Not one complaint or charge was made regarding Rumsfailed and Tenet, not even by any Dem in Congress. Rumsfaild's admission came (after) some in Congress called for his resignation and after Rep. Rangel issued Impeachment of Rumsfailed, which nothing has been heard of since then.

Does the US no longer follow the Geneva Convention or the Constitution of the USA?

It appears so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Shit flows downhill. Should be Bush's motto.
I'm still waiting for Kissinger, Westmoreland, McNamara, Rusk, et al, to take their place in the dock for those 2 million+ victims of their ambitions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
35. I Said Not Over 5, and Here's Why
There she is, a very stupid young woman, pregnant and looking at loosing a significant portion of her youth. There will be the baby she will not be able mother through the most important years too. Society won't be better served if she is imprisoned for what would be the better part of her life. As far as I know she didn't kill anyone. What she did can not be forgiven, but that does not mean that we should be mercyless in our assessment of what should be done to make her experience become the threat that will forever hang over the head of every GI to come.

Thom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catt03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
36. Seriously
they take a young woman from small town West Virginia, send her to Iraq, totally unprepared.

Reality check. She may lack morals and displayed poor judgment but the death penalty?

Fine her for ignorance and lack of common sense. Get the big guys.

Note: Her peers could have said "no" to the sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. sorry?
"Fine her for ignorance and lack of common sense. Get the big guys."

Do you really need to be educated or intelligent to know that this shit is wrong? does being from a piss poor town in West Virginia absolve you from human decency?

While I agree that this woman has been made a scapegoat and that those higher up also should be punished, "following orders" isn't an accepted excuse and neither is ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tactical Progressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
37. How about this:
1/4 of the time that Rummy and the military hierarchy get. Actual sentence to be deferred until they are sentenced.

If they get nothing, she gets nothing. Or they both get slammed. That keeps the connection, the actual flow of authority and responsibility, front and center in everyone's mind. What will Lynndie get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Bush and Rumsfeld should serve the same time she gets.
It is only just.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rexcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
41. War crimes are a bitch!
I say give her the max, 38 years seems appropriate to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
42. Could the soldier already sentenced have also gotten 38 years?

Does anyone know whether the charges against him were different from those against this person?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
43. Whatever she gets
Edited on Thu Aug-05-04 11:05 PM by Jack Rabbit
Whatever she gets, it should be a light sentence compared to what Bush, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft, Feith, General Miller and White House Council Gonzales should get for conspiring to put together this offshore system of gulags of which Abu Ghaib was only a part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
46. She should make a deal with prosecutors, and turn state's evidence
I would gladly let her walk if we could nail the Rumsfucker instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
48. Let's hand her over to the insurgents
a lot of the beheadings were claimed to be payback for this, so let's give them what they want to settle this whole thing down. let them do what they want with who started the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
49. About five minutes.
In a noose.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. I wrote this in a really bad mood.
I don't think she should get the death penalty (though five minutes in a noose wouldn't kill her, I don't think?).

She should definitely be punished, but I was just in a horrifically bad mood when I responded to this poll.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
50. No more than Bush Cheney Rumsfeld etc.... combined.
Yeah I need to say this several times this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jukes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
51. i didn't vote
Edited on Fri Aug-06-04 02:18 PM by jukes
i'd like her to turn "states evidence" & go in the witness protection program after testifying.

depending on convictions of ALL involved, o/c.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
54. Just Kick Her out of the Military
To a degree I feel that they should just kick her out of the Army. I think that would be bad enough. Her life will be pretty messed up after being dishonorably discharged from the Army.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC