So on the day John Kerry gave the most important speech of his career - his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention - the Pakistanis announced the capture of a "high value" Al Qaeda target, keeping precisely to the schedule predicted beforehand by John Judis and Spencer Ackerman in The New Republic:
But according to this ISI official, a White House aide told ul-Haq last spring that "it would be best if the arrest or killing of HVT were announced on twenty-six, twenty-seven, or twenty-eight July"--the first three days of the Democratic National Convention in Boston.
(Granted, according to the TNR, the Bushies asked for Osama, and instead only got a semi-celebrity terrorist. But when you're an incumbent president who can't crack 50% approval in the polls, you take what you can get.)
Then, right after Kerry's speech - and right as the Bush-Cheney campaign swung into its post-convention counterattack - we got the by-now familiar threat warning - but this time with enough scary specifics to cut through the by-now customary bored response from the press and the public.snip
We are told, however (and I have Holy Joe Lieberman's word on this), that this sudden flurry of activity has absolutely nothing to do with polls showing John Kerry narrowing the gap with Bush on the question of who would do a better job of fighting terrorism. Or with the fact that the latest ABC/Washington Post poll actually shows Kerry outranking ex-Lt. Shrub on the question of who is more qualified to be the nation's commander in chief.
Much much more.............
http://www.billmon.org/