|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Rosco T. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 01:46 PM Original message |
Major Paranoia... is BushCo TRYING to lose/throw the election??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ender (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. no, its a bonesman plot! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
7th_Sephiroth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. PNAC is not the proper term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ewagner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
3. I think there's another possibility: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosco T. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 01:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I can see that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calico1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 02:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. But its totally possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 01:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Yup, I Agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
5. PNAC no longer needs Junior |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaTeacher (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 01:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. it's not too far fetched for me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cthrumatrix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 04:08 PM Response to Reply #5 |
21. shrub has zero credibility....enter Kerry...sad but true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
8. No they're not trying to lose. Their tactics of negative ads, push |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
9. Well, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
10. only one way to thwart him/them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopaul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
12. a valid scenario |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
13. I've considered this too. If they've left an economic timebomb for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ewagner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 02:33 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. That's a very real concern |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 04:07 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Theoretically, solution is simple. Politically, it's next to impossible... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leanings (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
15. The Freemasons are poisoning the wells!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
16. Cheney isn't being low-profile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
17. I don't believe that the PNAC will accept any setbacks now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LizW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
18. They're not trying to lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbieinok (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
19. in 92, I worried abt voting for Clinton cause I thot the country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC