Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fineman "F911 removed from historical context..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 07:06 PM
Original message
Fineman "F911 removed from historical context..."
He wasn't trashing the movie per se (on Hardball) but said much of what was in it was removed from it's historical context?

Huh?

O.K. then, put it in context for us. By all means, do so. Why where the Saudi's and Bin Laden's allowed to fly out? Nobody has explained that yet.

Why does the Secret Service protect (at taxpayer expense) the Saudi Embassy?

Why was James Bath's name blacked out post 2001?

Did Bush Sr. NOT serve on the board of Carlysle with Bin Laden?

Did that woman NOT lose her son in the war?

I mean honestly. What is the historical context that is missing from this stuff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OpSomBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Michael Moore is so FAT! There's your context!
Sorry, I was in Freeper mode there again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think he was trying to use the
administration line that since 9-11 everything has changed. That's all I could possibly think that he meant. Not that that makes one bit of sense. It actually puts the facts 'in' context because it shows how much we have let terrorism win by our lose of rights. Notice how they never say just what isn't truthful or factual. They can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoping4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. And what is the context of * taking vacation pre-911 when
eveyone was running around with their hair on Fire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Boy, if that's the best he can come up with.....
he's screwed. And it makes me think he's trying to come up with some mental gymnastics that work on HIMSELF. Good luck, Howie, you pathetic fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Going on vacation the entire month of August 2001 is not out of context
sitting in that friggin' classroom for 7+ minutes is not out of historical context!

If he is getting his talking points from KKKarl, KKKarl is Cheneyed up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Rationalizations as context?
These guys need a shrink. It is their own rationalizations and acceptance of dangerous, bloody rationalizations for this blatantly unjust war that is the context they not, cannot face if they are to go to bed saying "Fineman, you are a fine man after all."

See a shrink and then come back and tell me about your judgment of objective reality. Moore's perceptions and editing ARE there. Where was the astute career journalist when the conscience of a nation was blinded and rushed to murder for profit? Cheerleading, obfuscating, making excuses,attacking dissenters, attacking the facts, lying like storm troopers- for context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Repukes love that "context" thingy
It's like when you were a kid and you could lie if you had your fingers crossed behind your back.

No explanation needed. :-)

It's just a fucking magical excuse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. He meant that Michael didn't take a minute to say the required
"Saddamwasabadmanhegassed&torturedhisownpeople"

Therefore, prepare to be skewered,Michael, no matter how truthful everything else is.

I wish he had put something like that in. It would have easily snatched away a RW talking point that is very annoying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Longhorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Much of that "context" was created BY the Republicans!
That was one of Michael Moore's points -- the use of scare tactics to keep build and maintain support for the Patriot Act, the war in Iraq, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Serious question: Is the press on drugs too?
Do they take the same drug, Ambien(?), that Colin Powell said the entire mis-administration took? Sure would explain THEIR cognitive dissonance - wouldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. i only saw a piece, but see a pattern of media
that is irritating the shit out of me. they tell me who i am and why i watch the movie and what i think and they are off once again and dont know jack shit presenting it to the world as fact

acting like i am a friggin follower of moore. acting like i am an extremist and that is the only reason i have interest in this movie. let the media get someone on tv and talk about this movie that have known this shit for months and havent heard it on tv at all. let them be told that finally the other side is being put out cause the media only presented ONE side of the story. and the only way the other side can be heard is certainly not on media, (this being a perfect example) so the left now has to resort to making movies

anyone else getting pissed

oooooosh........i feel better, lol lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. You've summed it up well.
The media is complicit in every crime of the Bush* administration. So, they can't allow any notion that Moore is even partially right. He's got to be an "extremist".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstateblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Howard The Duck
In all fairness Howard F. admitted the movie was powerful. I could tell he knows it is impacting people. He's one of those guys that as soon he smells a little blood in the water he changes sides. a true flip flopper- like Tweety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Because shut up! That's why!
I love the Simpsons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpetbagger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. Moore didn't put it in split-screen form with the Clenis.
That is your historical context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think Fineman said F-9/11's truth was removed from
Edited on Mon Jun-28-04 09:17 PM by stickdog
his whore & tell complex.

Well, at least that's what I heard ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC