Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Coulter Challenge (Ann looks "haggard and clinically insane")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:01 PM
Original message
The Coulter Challenge (Ann looks "haggard and clinically insane")
MeeeYOW!

http://nypress.com/17/25/news&columns/MarkAmes.cfm

But o, how the mighty have fallen. Last week, Ann Coulter appeared on Hannity & Colmes looking haggard and clinically insane. The Night of the Living Dead circles underneath her eyes, the lifeless hair—it looks like she's been living on canned foods for the past two months. Ann looked like she should be pushing a shopping cart, not politicking for Bush. It wasn't just what she said—like repeatedly accusing Holocaust survivor George Soros of being an anti-Semite—it was how she said it. She laughed insanely after every sentence fragment she uttered, a clear symptom of late-stage paranoid-schizophrenia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. ann IS haggard and clinically insane! lol! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Your link
didn't work for me. I'd love to read about Ann's troubles though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is great but what does MILF mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. yeah inquiring minds want to know n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. stands for a Mom I'd Like To F***
though I cannot imagine that term applying to Annthrax! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wright Patman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Mothers I'd Like to
uh, Fiddle around with ... or something like that. Let me just say that Vice President Cheney has recently publicized the last word of the acronym on the floor of the Senate.

It is also the acronym of a terrorist group in the Philippines, I recently discovered. I bet they wonder why Western tourists laugh at them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Late stage syphillis will do that too!
Ann-the-man's got brain rot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. But even if he wins the bet

he loses... because he had to f* her.

I couldn't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. okay
it worked this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. from the party who calls us 'wild-eyed"
wonder how they explain savage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stew225 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think the guy who wrote the article is
an asshole. Who the f does he think he is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. boooo no pics
:(

I want to see her pic looking like a blonde vampire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Here ya go
My favorite Ann Coulter pic:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. I thought most of the right wingers were nuts
so that doesn't surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. As much as I love a good Anne Coulter slam...
It's frustrating that we're left with sex as the bottom line when discussing Coulter. It's not her sexuality that is at issue--bad hair day or no--it is the completely false things that she says. Her words need to be deconstructed, not her fuckability.

Anne Coulter in the dark (like just about any other female in the dark) could certainly rub a guy into submission without much effort. I think that Mark Ames, in spite of himself, would lose the bet he makes in his article and end up having to vote for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Her looks were the only reason she ever got to spew her crap
So sex was always the bottom line when discussing the skank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Her looks AND her gender...
and that's why neither are offlimits when attacking her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. I don't buy it , II. (The sequel)
She was not chosen for her gender any more than Laura Schlessinger was. It is true that as a female, she could get away with knocking feminism in a way that no male neocon could do with total credibility (with a female neocon audience). But that is just one set of issues. Coulter never restricted her comments to "women's issues". It wasn't about her gender. It was about her willingness to say anything without shame.

Coulter was considered good-looking by some people--as is Sean Hannity. Not every neocon can be as butt ugly as Rush or O'Reilly. And, of course, there are other female Republicans and neocons out there, but most of them do not have the complete brazenness to say whatever is the most destructive.

If you are going to trash Coulter--and she SHOULD be trashed for the lies she tells on a continuous basis--don't rush to sex. IT will backfire, especially for Democrats. We are the party that is supposed to respect women more than the Republicans. Whenever you trash a neocon type on her sexuality, you give the Limbaughs out there fuel to trash the party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Well, you should buy it (because it's true)
She was first given airtime as a wingnut barking head during the Clinton witch hunt- "Oh look, women calling the Dem president on his 'exploitation' of women. I guess they aren't the party who care about women"
Laura Schlessinger was also trotted out for the same reason at the same time. Trust me (but also do some research, youll see that this is true)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Where is the link?
I'll be happy to read the history on it.

From what you've said, however, it seems that Coulter was a neocon operative before she appeared on TV. If she was pulled out of the pack and placed in that particular forum to lambaste Clinton on a "women's issue", then, yes, her gender was the reason she got air time at first. But don't equate gender with sexuality. When a NOW President gets on the air to talk about a bad law for women, she is also there because of her gender. She is not there, however, for her sexuality.

Also, the reason that Coulter continued on past the Paula Jones story is that she was able to out-shock the neocon shock jocks. She was horrible, there is no question about it. And she was factually wrong most of the time. That is the reason to go after her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I don't buy it
I think she was there for her willingness to say any damn thing with a certainty that could only have been born of ignorance.

She was the female Hannity, but never got the national radio/TV deals, probably because of her gender. This is not to say she didn't use sexual appeal--as did Hannity incidentally--but this was not her primary goal. IF she had wanted to be a pinup, she'd have gone to Playboy. What she wanted, it seems, was to be taken seriously as a viscious neocon, the queen of the vultures.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. Jesus, this guy is crazy!!!
I can't believe he wrote this. I think it's cool, but so over the top that I have this permanent perplexed look.

So here is my public challenge to Ann Coulter: I propose that you and I spend a night together in a four-star hotel. We will wine together, we will dine together, we will harden each other's nipples with erotic pillow talk about Sen. Joe McCarthy, and yes, Ann, we will fuck. Ann, here's the dare: I am betting that no matter how much you try, no matter what prostate-massaging tricks a John Birch Prom Queen like you possesses, you, Ann Coulter, cannot make me come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Wow...
I's like to talk to him...I only know about 2 prostate-massaging tricks- does he have a few to spare that I can teach my wife?

Who sez this ain't an informative website?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. She looks like a White Anglo-Saxon Crack-ho'
She's consistently given me the impression she has some pretty deeply-seated demons. I actually met her a few years ago -- she seemed nervous, fidgety and twitchy, sort of as if she needed a fix real fast...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. It's the cocaine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
23. Saw this at The Smirking Chimp yesterday
and thought while it was a nice poke at Ann he totally blew his cred with that stupid challenge. Does anyone have a picture or a link to video that he was talking about. I can't bring myself to watch H&C but I'd love to see how she looked..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
27. Oh. My. God.
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 09:34 PM by Scairp
Who is this guy? He sounds a couple of sandwiches short of a picnic himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC