Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

should Lou Dobbs be put on the religious nut list?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:21 PM
Original message
should Lou Dobbs be put on the religious nut list?

on his show last nite, in a really smarmy voice, wondered aloud: is it so bad to have kids say "under god" in the pledge, considering all the so-much-worse things that go on in their schools every day?


here's a kick in the shin Lou
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lou is on our side I think!
Overall he is the most honest reporter on CNN I think!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Lou can fool you - most of the time he seems not too bushgangish, but

then he will say something that breaks his cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. I know Lou is no Democrat. But, believe it or not, a lot of Dems..
think "under God" should remain in the pledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Do you?
Dobbs, by the way, proudly says "I've been a Republican all my life".

Are you one of the Democrats who thinks "under god" should remain in the pledge? If so, how is this not a violation of Article One of the Bill of Rights? A phrase like that is official endorsement that such a thing exists; remember, the issue is not establishment of a particular religion, but the concept of religion itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think that statement makes one a religious nut
It seems pretty mild to me. But don't let me stop the witch hunt if that is what you are in to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. nay, I don't hunt witches


under god wasn't in the pledge until the nuts bullied it in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. so what does that have to do with Dobbs being a religious nut?
Edited on Tue Jun-15-04 12:49 PM by Cheswick
Do you think that everyone who suggests this is a non issue is a religious nut?

But don't let me rain on your anti religious burning at the stake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. One comment about one issue does not make one a fanatic
He expressed his opinion, briefly. I know a lot of people who aren't particularly religious or superstitious who support "under God" being in the pledge. I personally don't care, as I don't say the pledge because Jesus said not to take oaths (Matthew 5:33-37). I love to quote this to patriotic fundamentalists.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. I didn't see that show, but knowing Lou it sounds like a rhetorical ?.
He might have been playing devil's advocate. I like Lou in general, although occasionally he disappoints.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Lou Dobbs has made an invalid analogy.
Children are not forced to recite those "so much worse" things.

I think the Dobbster is trying to hint that religion can supplant those "so much worse" things. Message to Louie: parents can accomplish that, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. yeah, we shouldn't care about students not being able to read
they have bigger problems, like guns and sex
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. As a non-Christian..
... I find the "under god" thing to be about number 99 on my top 100 list of problems in this country.

It is a small compromise I'm willing to make, especially since nobody has to actually say it - you can always just go silent for those 2 words.

Yes, there is a principle involved, but there is also pragmatism. Should "we" ever actually get those 2 words removed, the political price will be far in excess of any benefit.

Lou is ok by me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. You are clearly not a good leftist
what's more you are ruining a perfectly good anti-religious crusade. Every day on DU must bring it's minute of hate threads against religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. Dammit Cheswick :)
I'm not interested in being "good", I'm interested in being "effective". This issue would be the GOP's wedge wet dream. Anyone who thinks the SCOTUS didn't just do us a big favor ought to give me some of what they are smoking :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. I agree -political price will be far in excess of any benefit.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. i am a ZEALOT for separation of church and state,
Edited on Tue Jun-15-04 12:32 PM by Paradise
however, for some unexplainable reason, this "under god" doesn't trouble me. go figure??? :shrug:
you may tell me why i'm wrong but no flaming, p l e a s e! O8) btw, i'm definitely NOT religious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I agree Paradise.
Separation of Church and State is in my top five issues. However, though I know all of the stuff about "under God" in the pledge, I don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. thanks, patrice.
i was wondering if it was just me. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. nope it's not just you
I am religious and I belong to several organization which fight FOR the separation of church and state. I don't care if they take under God Out of the pledge. But I think for most people it is simply a non issue.

I do not say the pledge because I don't do loyalty oaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Love your creeper Cheswick.
I tell folks I'm a Deanocrat. We will see Howard here in K.C. this Saturday in support of Vicky Walker (YEAH!!!!)

I totally believe in his program to cultivate the grassroots, have a few projects of my own under development along those lines with 501C3s because they are ISSUE oriented, i.e. where it's at for grassroots = what is happening to people = issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. No. His "jihad" on outsourcing for cheap overseas labor
far out weighs his opinion on "under God".

He is showing corporate America for the greedy bastard they are and how the administration holds their hand while they take everyone's money.

I tell Lou, keep up the good work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. he does kinda have a point, doesn't he?
what he was saying was the amount of attention being payed and resources being expended by both sides of this issue are way out of proportion to what kids are really in need of in schools.

the smarmy voice was to emphasize that this issue, at it's core, is pretty inane, whether you're a Jesus freak or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. Wait, you mean Lou says there are bad things going on in schools?
Like what? Lack of books, overcrowding, teaching to tests not subjects, whatever could he mean?

And to think his guy Smirkaholic centered his campaign on No Child Left Behind! Wow, I guess Lou just admitted Bush is a failure! Hahahaha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'd like Lou to explain his $1000 donation to * first!
Edited on Tue Jun-15-04 12:33 PM by newsmeat.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. I doni't know Lou
Will you be ok if they branch out and use Allah, Adonai, or Zeus?

And what about Athena?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankly_fedup2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Question?
What the heck is your avatar? I'm tired, not getting much sleep; however, it looks like an Ostrich or some bird riding a bike. Was just wondering because I cannot be sure what it is. If it is an Ostrich riding a bicycle, what does that represent?

And just to make it clear to everyone . . .I do not do drugs NOR do I drink (just wanted to be clear on that). I'm just tired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. It is me, riding on a short wheelbase recumbent bike
on a parking lot. The handlebars are under the seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankly_fedup2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. (laughing)
I see it now.  It definitely does not look like an ostrich. 
(laughing).  
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. who cares
I think the point is that there are bigger issues to worry about.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hey--I happen to agree with him.
I think having "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance is really a non-issue. It's not like, say, trying to post the Ten Commandments on public property.

I'm not a religious nut (I'm not a Christian at all, as a matter of fact), but the country was founded by Christians who thought that God played a part in the founding of the country. So it could be construed that "under God" in the pledge is merely acknowledging that the country was formed "under God," according to the founding fathers (which it was), and not a declaration that we all must think the country exists "under God."

But no matter how it is construed, Ijust don't think it's a big enough deal to make an issue out of it. The battles should be confined to those matters that truly cross the separation of church and state line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
18. Na, not based on that
There are atheists that take that attitude. Religious fanaticism may be a problem but we can't go around imagining its behind every singple pronouncement that does not blast god into oblivion. God is not a big deal for some people. Whether they believe or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankly_fedup2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. I watch Lou Dobbs every night. I must not have
been paying attention when he said that. Lou's show has been the only show to try to get corporations to stay in the U.S. and if they do not, do not give them big benefits if they do.

I agree with what he said in your post to a certain extent. It seems petty to me. I think we have more important issues to worry about right now . . . like getting our troops home, getting a Dem in the White House as well as getting more Dems in the Congress.
Saying "One nation, under God" to me is not specifying any God. Now if it said "One Nation under our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ," that would be specifically a Christian God. That should NOT be allowed because there are more than Christians that pledge to the Flag of the U.S. And as always, anyone that does not want to say it doesn't have to.

The Senate, Congress, Supreme Court all start out with a prayer to God. Not a specific God, but to everyone who believes there is a God and, again, those who do not want to pray along do not have to. Also, are we going to remove from our money "In God We Trust?"

That's just my opinion. Lou Dobbs does appear to lean to the left more than the right with his comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Outlaw420 Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
30. What about all the other patrotic material?
Ok remove "Under God" and also remove "Indivisible" Seems we are divided. Next take off "In God We Trust" On the money and replace it with "In nothing we trust" Oh and also "God Bless America" Needs to be changed to "Who cares about America?"By the end of this we will have nothing left to believe in not even a country. But hey Why stop ther lets petition to have all the churches remove their signs out in front of the buildings so non-believers don't have to see the names and how about the crosses lets rip those down too seeing as how its a symbol of the christian religion. How about banning the printing of the bible so non-believers don't have to see copies of it in their favorite book stores. and if that don't work we can always outlaw the religion all together lets have our own "Holy War" right here!!!! Wouldn't that be great!!! NO MORE CHRISTIANS WHOOOOOHOOOOOO!!!! :evilgrin: Lets make'em hide in back allies and dark places to do that stuff. we don't wanna see that crap or even know it exsist!! What a Joke!!
Forgive them father for they know not what they do
I really have to agree with him there are more pressing issues than this that really need to be fixed before this gets out of hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. goodness sakes, take a toke and calm down

I don't like dark alleys either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC