Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF is up with shrubco NOT closing down Abu Ghraib and blasting it to

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 02:18 AM
Original message
WTF is up with shrubco NOT closing down Abu Ghraib and blasting it to
rubble? Even if they wanted to continue their nefarious torture campaign on the sly, you'd think they'd move it somewhere else just to avoid the symbolism and bad PR, especially now. Can these guys buy a clue.:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. I want them to close it down but not blast it
I think it needs to remain as a lasting testament of shame- a war memorial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree
The only crime worse than destroying history is the history that took place there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bleacher Creature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. On Franken's show yesterday. . .
Joe Conason made the point that if you blow it up, you also blow up all of the evidence of what really went on. I'm afraid that if there's any hope of getting to the bottom of all of this, he's right.

Also, it's not Shrubco's decision--or at least it shouldn't be. The Iraqi people need to decide what to do with it, not us. If they want to keep it standing as a reminder of what it represents, that's their right the same as it was Poland's right to keep Auschwitz standing, or any other society that made a similar decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. You're spot on..
It's not Bush's decision. It's not 'our' decision. It's up to the Iraqi people to decide. We are not their keepers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Too little, too late
The butchery, the maiming, the slaughter, the torture - this has been going on throughout Iraq for over a year. No Iraqi and only the most naive American would see this as anything more than a totally meaningless PR stunt. Release all the tens of thousands of Iraqis held by fasciat invaders and leave? That would mean something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. 3 words..
Its Clinton's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. They should have blown it down immediately
They never should have set up shop in that place...

What the fuck were they thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bleacher Creature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Who ever said they were thinking?
The only thing it appears they ever thought about was how to protect the oil fields. Everything else was decided on the fly. :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Bingo!
Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. What were they thinking?
They weren't. At all.

The prime requirement of membership in BuchCo is that one must be an asshole.

Bush if the King of the Assholes.

And maybe this isn't a productive thing to say, but it's still true. The sumbitch is a freaking, moranic(tm) asshole.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. They have need of it
I heard them say so. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC