Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just found out today; CT refused to buy BBV machines!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 10:57 PM
Original message
Just found out today; CT refused to buy BBV machines!
From the get-go, apparently, the powers that be here in CT expressed fears about the electronic machines, and we'll all be using the old models in Nov. I used one in the primary, but assumed it was we are in a small-ish town, and just hadn't gotten them yet. But I just read in the paper that there are no plans to introduce them yet! This is the first thing I've seen the state do something that I agree with!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Diebold and its ilk are ...

...starting to bite the dust big time. Maybe there is some hope of a fair election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I also read in the paper today that California is probably going
to pass on them too. They are "very flawed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. One can only hope.
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liarliartieonfire Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Great News Maybe Others
will follow CT in this sensible thinking.
What State wants to risk it all for another 4 years of george.

Hope the Saudis didn't pre-pay Diebold for all those new machines, just yet.

This move by CT should be mentioned to every State Voting Comission.

Its like getting "permission"for every state to do the smart thing and stay with the tried and true paper trail voting system.

May CT lead the way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. isnt it amazing how attractive the old ones are now
compared to the new ones we received. how many people would in a flash take back what we had. where i am we get a pencil and piece of paper

good for ct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ParanoidPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Do you HAVA source for that? Don't believe everything you hear.....
.....This information comes directly from your Secretary of State website. It can be found at this link. (Word .doc format)

SUMMARY OF FACTS REGARDING VOTING MACHINE DEMO PROJECT


The Law


Connecticut Public Act 03-07 allows this office to conduct a project using electronic voting machines in at least 3 towns in the state during the 2003 and 2004 elections provided sufficient numbers of machine vendors willing to donate resources can be obtained. The Secretary of the State is responsible for selecting which machines may be used, coordinating the project by working with both local officials and the voting machine companies, conducting an exit poll to learn of voters’ impressions of the machines and then reporting to the General Assembly the results of such exit poll.

Secretary of the State Actions to Date
In May 2003 letters were sent to various voting machine companies that have been certified by the National Association of State Election Directors to solicit their participation in this project. Companies will have to supply machines at no cost, train the local officials on how to set up and use the machines and to provide a representative in each polling place using their machine. Four companies met all criteria set forth above and will participate in the project. They are Avanti (International Technology, Inc.), Sequoia (Voting Systems), Danaher Control (LHS) and Diebolt(sic) Election System.

Also during May, letters were sent to all Registrars of Voters soliciting their town’s participation in the project. Numerous towns submitted letters and eight towns were selected to participate. The selections were based on both the location of the town and the number of registered voters. The towns that will participate are: Cromwell, Griswold, Hartford, Middletown, Sharon, Southington, West Hartford and Wilton. In many cases, the electronic machines will only be used in one or two districts in a town and not the entire town.

The Registrars in these towns will be responsible for learning how to use the voting machine that is selected for their town, training their poll workers on its use and for holding public demonstrations of the machine in their town to educate voters.

The Secretary of the State has advised local officials of what voting machine company will be assigned to their town and the registrars of voters have met with representatives of the voting machine company to discuss training, demonstrating the machine in their town and specific requirements for the use of the machines. A press conference will be held in September to announce this information.

The Secretary of the State is creating different handbooks for each of the machine types and these will be available to the local officials in early October so that they have sufficient time to train their poll workers.

<End>

They just haven't chosen which one they want to use yet. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. did anybody get a source on this?
I'd love to know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lori Price CLG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-04 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, now if we could only get rid of Rowland...
(corrupt GOPiglet governor and friend of Jeb's, poised to be impeached) life would be grand! :bounce:

:)-Lori



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. I heard the Sec of State a few weeks back
Sec of State Susan Bysiewicz was on with Colin McEnroe a few weeks back and she expressed grave concerns about the reliability & security of BBV machines, not to mention the lack of a paper trail, and she also mentioned how the CEO of Diebold had vowed to deliver Ohio to Shrub.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC