Very long, worth a read. (May want to put on tin foil hat for some of it)
SenderBerl's perception of Condoleezza Rice's true role in the Bush presidency
Important Photo Album Posted Below
March 27, 2004
Abstract: Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. explains that many mysteries are answered understanding that Condy Rice is not the true National Security Advisor. She was hand selected by Bush 41 in the late 90s to spend two years with his son to teach him foreign affairs. When he won the presidency, Bush 41 fully supported her having the NSA position, where she could be with his son constantly to monitor that he would not revert to drugs or alcohol under the pressures that would arise in connection with the events of 9-11. Most significantly, Bush 41 encouraged a close personal relationship between them because it was essential to his son pulling off his assigned role as President of the United States in the NWO quest to obtain control over Middle East oil.
We want to emphasize from the start that we may prove wrong on this assertion, but we firmly believe that the relationship between President Bush and Condoleezza Rice as one in pursuit of an agenda to undermine the United States of America to wit: to help allow the President to be complicit with regard to 9-11 without showing any consciousness of guilt with regard thereto. Therefore please permit us to explain this vital proposition because it is essential to understand to help prove the putative wrongdoing.
snip to the end:Leaders used to be on the front line when their nation went to war and stood at personal risk. Today's leaders are far from the battlefront, and show themselves when they fail to account to the nation they serve, not rule. We know why Bush, Cheney and Rice dread an appearance albeit they have been assured that nothing untoward will happen (Bush and Cheney don't even pretend to offer sworn testimony). Bush and Rice are masters of prepared text; when hit with a question from left field they may slip and touch upon the truths we have been highlighting to the public for seven years. We would love to see Rice asked whether she was aware (and when) of the numerous reports that Al-Quaeda were planning attacks with airplances on major buildings. If she says yes, she then lied when she said what she did after 9-11. If she did not, then how are we to believe that she is the true National Security Advisor? SenderBerl here would like to deploy the logic behind the Patriot Act to suggest that public officials who seek to hide from responding to Committee questions regarding 9-11 and whose associates have indicated plans in hand to put the country under military control should be subject to pre-emptive action and removed from office pending investigation of the disturbing and thus suspicious behavior as outlined by the New York Times story.
The sad aspect of what we write is that we know the truth about what took place on 9-11.
If you have reviewed this site, you should know the truth as well.
http://www.senderberl.com/bushrice.htm