Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Bush is not creating new terrorists in Iraq. So quit saying that

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 08:04 AM
Original message
Bush is not creating new terrorists in Iraq. So quit saying that

<snip>Guerrillas coming out of Fallujah have complained bitterly that Kurdish militiamen known as pesh merga are deployed against them. The Kurds are members of the 36th Battalion of the Iraqi Civil Defense Corps, built from several exile-based militias that supported the U.S.-led campaign against Saddam Hussein (news - web sites). Commanders of another, overwhelmingly Arab Iraqi army battalion refused to fight alongside the Marines.

"Worse than pigs, thieves and tramps," read lines in a poem circulating on fliers in Kirkuk, a city in northern Iraq where Kurds are accused of pushing Arab families off land claimed by both groups. The fliers condemned the leaders of Iraq's two Kurdish parties. It is not known who produced the fliers, which were also seen in Baghdad.

The Kurdish leaders were condemned in chanting that followed Friday prayers at a major Sunni mosque in Baghdad.

"When the fighting is over in Fallujah, I will sell everything I have, even my home," said a resistance fighter who gave his name as Abu Taif Mashhadani. He wept as he recalled his 8-year-old daughter, who he said was killed by a U.S. sniper in Fallujah a week ago. "I will send my brothers north to kill the Kurds, and I will go to America and target the civilians. Only the civilians. Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth. And the one who started it will be the one to be blamed."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
markomalley Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is historically correct!
The elder Bush is the one responsible for Al Qaida focusing on us. Had he left matters alone, we would have never been in the cross hairs.

And, when you think about it, why should we have cared one way or the other? Kuwait -- a free country????? Give me a break. Protecting Saudi? Yeah, right.

Even the blood for oil argument made no sense. If they wanted money, they would sell oil. All of the b@stards over there are inbred dictators -- what would it matter if we bought oil from one dictator or another?

All this invasion did was to increase the amount of hatred of us -- but it was there in the first place anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Welcome mark!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. but it does fill the PNAC doctrine
of perpetual war

The war in Iraq will fill the ranks of Terrorist fodder and therefore fore fill the PNAC doctrine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Very disheartening and completely predictable--
What do you make of the last section, about children as combatants??

"No less sobering, commanders said, were new reports of children playing roles in guerrilla attacks. In Baghdad Tuesday, a girl about 6 or 7 years old dropped an explosive from a highway overpass onto a convoy. A commander was killed in a similar incident outside Fallujah, when a convoy was ambushed after slowing for a girl leading cattle across a highway."

While I don't have a strong reason to doubt that children are being used by militants, it's worth noting that the little cowgirl was never interviewed or accounted for in the reports of the gunfight that ensued. I suspect she was killed.

I am deeply suspicious and dismayed that after ignoring the deaths of children so resolutely and contrary to their professional obligation to report accurately and fairly, major media outlets like the Post are now coming up with a story like this. It seems like a justification for killing children, like a spoonfed concoction. As I said, I don't doubt the basic premise that children are being exploited--but this just doesn't seem like good journalism to me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-04 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. No question, whatsoever we have sown, that shall we also reap.
Christians should know this better than anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 23rd 2018, 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC