Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Aide changes position...PDB info requested by Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 06:12 PM
Original message
Aide changes position...PDB info requested by Bush
Wasn't the original story that "* was given the PDB", but the story was later changed to "* ASKED for the PDB"? I could have sworn that the 9/11 commission addressed this--anyone remember?


A CIA agent changed his story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought the original story was bush* requested
then Ben Veniste got Tenet to admit that it had been prepared for bush*, but not at his request. Anyone have a link to the testimony? I look for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkey see Monkey Do Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. testimony
BEN VENISTE: Let me pick up on, since my colleague, Senator Kerrey, raised the question -- with respect to the PDD of August 8, 2001, Dr. Rice has made some statements to us and, to some extent, publicly with respect to the origin of that document.
Is it fair to say that the recollection of CIA, which we have received in a written document from your office, contains a different recollection -- that that August 8th PDD was initiated by individuals within the CIA and not as a direct request from the national security adviser?
TENET: I simply don't know. I don't know what we've responded or what the origin is. I just don't know.
BEN-VENISTE: You might ask Mr. Bonk (ph) who is sitting behind you.
It is correct that we had received a document from you dated March 19th, 2004, in which that correction is noted?
TENET: Would you like Mr. Bonk (ph) to respond?
BEN-VENISTE: Well, he can whisper in your ear.
So that the record is correct on this point, since it was raised by Senator Kerrey, I think it's appropriate that we have been advised that the August 6th PDD was the product of individuals within CIA without prompting from national security...
(CROSSTALK)
TENET: Commissioner Ben-Veniste, Ben only has a recollection. Let me come back for the record. I'll go back and look at this. I just don't...
BEN-VENISTE: Well, I'll read into the record.
The author of this piece and others familiar with it say they have no information to suggest that this piece was written in response to a question from the president. And indeed, it goes on to say that it was prompted by an idea from the CIA.
So we have these clarifications and it's appropriate that the record be as accurate as possible.

(sorry don't have weblink)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Gracias.
Lying dogs--still trying to pretend the chimp has a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. thanks for posting
that's what I remembered...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Oh that is HUGE
Because if the CIA generated this, it's a warning. Most likely because Tenet was running around "with his hair on fire" all summer and couldn't get the Bushies to pay attention. I bet they finally decided to put it in as simple as words as possible. Apparently, they really did need to draw crayon pictures of airplanes being hijacked and buildings exploding on the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for the interest on this...
I think it is a big issue, but the facts are scarce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Could this be perjury from Condi?
Or did she forget? You're right, it's very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC