Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Cheney Legacy?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 04:32 PM
Original message
Cheney Legacy?
Despise the Bush Administration as much as I do there is still one aspect of it that I think might be worth repeating. That is the Vice President's high place in the affairs of the nation. I believe that Clinton heeped responsibility on Gore, much more than had been the case with any previous Vice President, but its nothing like this. Set aside the notion that its really Cheney that runs the Presidency and that the pimp is just a brainless face, even if it is Bush that is running things the power of the Vice President is obvious.

I hope that Kerry picks a running mate who is not only capable of stepping up if the need be but more importantly is deeply immersed in the activities of the President. I'm not talking about a Co-Presidency here but something awfully close. I honestly think that the precident is the one good thing to come out of the Bush/Cheney Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't care whether Kerry runs w/ Charlie Manson! LOL!
I want * out. He's inept, dangerous and a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mulethree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Chief of Staff?
The White House Chief of Staff position, and other unelected White House advisors have a lot of power and impact even in the Cheney white house. I've heard Cheney referred to as the COO (Chief Operating Officer) lately (?John Dean I think?) and that seems more in line with Chief of Staff to me.

When the founders made up the post of Vice President it was pretty much strictly to have spare president on hand.

But they also had an issue with the President of the Senate, That role in other Parliaments was not allowed to vote, but if it were filled by a senator, then one of the states would have only half a vote.

So the VP, who would "otherwise lack any employment" was given the senate presidency. Of course in the old days the VP was usually the runner-up from the presidential election, and so couldn't be expected to be in the White house following orders.

This link is interesting :
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan 19th 2018, 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC