Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Uh-Oh! The Secret Homosexual Agenda is Out!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 03:38 PM
Original message
Uh-Oh! The Secret Homosexual Agenda is Out!
A letter by a local freeper in our Sunday newspaper has blown the cover for "gayo-Americans", and revealed the hidden homosexual agenda! Those dastardly homosexuals, with their evil plots to destroy heterosexual marriages and eventually take over the world! </sarcasm>

Read on...

====================================================================

I am deeply concerned over efforts of homosexuals to gain the so-called "right to marry."

I have learned recently that homosexual activists actually have a hidden agenda in their effort to gain legal status for same-sex relationships: They want to destroy the concept of marriage altogether!

The Traditional Values Coalition has recently published a report that quotes homosexual activists about this real agenda. One of them is Michelangelo Signorile, who writes in "Out" magazine that homosexuals should "fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely."

TVC also quotes from the "1972 Gay Rights Platform Demands," in which homosexuals demand "repeal of all legislative provisions that restrict the sex or number of persons entering into a marriage unit." In other words, homosexuals want to legalize polygamy and polyamory (group sex) as "families." The TVC report is available on its Web site at: http://traditionalvalues.org.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Amerpie Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Edicts
I wonder how many people actually think there is a "National Gay Headquarters" sending out daily marching orders to secret cells of gay activists. Somehow, someone has gotten all the gay people in Americaa to agree to the same agenda and the same tactics. all the while following the same shadowy unnamed leader.

Oh, the humanity....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. NG Headquarters was on TV!
on Queer Eye for the PAC Guy. They redecorated the entire "National Gay Headquarters." They made it quite chic actually! Before hand it had this dreary NRA-wanna be thing going, all gun metal gray and serious. Now it's happy and says "Hi, Marry Me Yu Big HunkaLove!"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. all gay people...to agree - you've got to be kidding
You can't get two gay people to agree on a flower arrangment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh no!
:think:

If gay people get married, all the straight people will suddenly think to themselves, "why am I married?" and "what's the point of being married if just ANYONE can get married, even gay people?" and others will think, "what's the point of being straight if I can be gay and still get married," and the institution of marriage will collapse, and then Armageddon will occur, and then all the gay people will burn in hell.

:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Only then will you get a free toaster oven!
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...

Don't tell! It's a secret!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drkedjr Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Some people are convinced
of the "truth" of their anti-gay delusions due to intellectual and moral laziness.
Others are clearly insane.
http://www.monadnockgaymen.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teddy_Salad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh no!!!

If gay people get married, it will have the effect of causing over 50% of heterosexual marriages to end in divorce!

Oh.......hang on..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. If gays are allowed to marry,
they will book all the good places months in advance! :O

We heterosexuals will have to get married at Howard Johnsons!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cursive_Knives512 Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's so terrible
It's like saying 40 years ago, "Oh, I know what the African-American agenda is! They want to be able to vote, too, and redefine the definitions of equality in America!"

Traditional Values--my asshtray. Blah.

"dastardly"-> I haven't heard that in a while. I'm gonna start saying it from now on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. wow..and his ignorance is there to point back to him in posterity
nothing can ever destroy the concept of marriage as long as there's a woman who wants to be princess for the day, wear the big, white dress, have the big, huge party with all the presents and money.

So, how does Mr. Brilliant assess marriages arranged on "Who wants to marry a millionare?" What about serial marriages of movies stars back in the day? How is that not any more of a mockery to the institution of marriage than gays marrying?

To me, shows like that makes a bigger mockery of the institution of marriage than two gays/lesbians who are thoroughly committed to one another and have been for years and years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triple H Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. What an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Those bastard Gayo's!
I used to only worry about Homosexuals. Now I have to watch out for gayos!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ezee Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. The institution of marriage
was re-defined when divorce became legal, again when white men where allowed to marry black women,and visa-versa. It hasn't gone away. Marriage is still well and thriving. All gay and lesbian people want is the same rights that all people have who want to be committed to each other as a unit/couple. There are over 1001 federal and state rights that apply to married couples that dont apply to non married couples. That is all we want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. I've wondered if the real issue is gender
For people who believe that men and women are completely different and have completely different roles in life, it would seem that gay marriage would completely redefine marriage. For those who believe that individual men and women have a right to be whatever they want to be and have most roles available to them (with the exception of some physical impossibilities like men giving birth), gay marriage doesn't seem like a big deal.
For example, perhaps Mary would prefer to be the one who does the lawn work and has the higher earning job whether or not she would marry a man or a woman and John would prefer to stay at home and take care of the house whether or not he married a man or woman.
I think a lot of these people don't look at it this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Bingo
I think you hit the nail on the head.

If it's important to keep women subservient to their husbands--and in much religious dogma concerning marriage, it's clear that one of the primary functions of marriage is to keep women under the control of a man once her father relinquishes control or dies--then the concept of gay marriage does upend the whole institution.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cursive_Knives512 Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I agree with both of you...
But what I really think is going on is that it's not just about gender "roles," but about control over reproduction. That's why I think that feminism and tolerance towards homosexuality go hand-in-hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC