http://www.campaigndesk.org/archives/000374.asp-snip-
Latest example: A reader clued us in to this piece of expert political analysis from CNN's Bill Schneider. On yesterday's "Inside Politics," Schneider told viewers, "On Tuesday we reported that in our latest poll, President Bush has pulled ahead of John Kerry in the 18 swing states where the Bush campaign has been running ads ... White House political strategist Karl Rove called CNN to say he thinks we're giving too much credit to the Bush campaigns anti-Kerry ads."
There then followed an "analysis" of the cause of Kerry's drop-off. Was it indeed the result of the negative ads, or was it caused, as Rove argued, by the White House's positive ads praising the president, and by the fact that, as more voters get to know Kerry, he becomes less popular? The discussion allowed CNN to play footage from one Bush ad, and a clip of President Bush criticizing John Kerry.
-snip-
But something tells us that Karl Rove doesn't much care one way or the other. As long as CNN is "analyzing" why Kerry's hit the skids, it's putting out a storyline the White House likes. That's why Rove called Schneider -- he was trying to milk another day's coverage out of Tuesday's poll results. And Schneider, eager to share with the world the "news" that Karl Rove had called him in person, duly obliged.
-snip-
-----------------------------
CNN sure has a lot of fun bilking the public