Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MUST READ.. Our military is in worse shape than we feared

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 02:07 AM
Original message
MUST READ.. Our military is in worse shape than we feared
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DeaconBlues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bush in 2000 "not ready for duty, sir"
Remember how Bush ripped the Clinton administration regarding the state of the military? Kerry needs to do the same now. Bush has really placed this nation in danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adjwilli Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Do you really believe the US military isn't strong enough?
Before we upgrade the military to an even higher level that Bush, let's stop and think about what it would really do. First of all, in the Clintonian years, the military was already the largest in the world, far exceeding any other. Yet, everyone seemed to agree that it was in bad shape, and who do we ask as experts on that? Oh yeah, Republicans and military officers. Good, unbiased sources. So, then Bush gets elected and this already ridiculously large upgrade happened. But still, have we answered the question of why we need such an outstanding military?

The United States before Cheney waged his imperial conquest into Iraq, and before 9/11 had no major rivaling, hostile nation-state, bloc or alliance to require such a military. Our main involvement in military operations since Veitnam has been always been to act as a "peacekeeper," which is term used to describe out presence.

We've been involved all over Latin America, in some countries more so than others. What interest did we have down there? Fighting revolutions that threated US interests, such as cheap coffee, sugar, fruit, oil, tin, etc. Why did we get involved in Kosovo, and use so much force so quickly? Violence in Europe, our most dear ally aside from Israel or Japan - our reason for keeping North Korea at bay - could not have a war within or near its territory. The reason is less material, so we needed to make the war short and to the point. If we had people dying there, being attacked like in Somalia or recently now in Iraq, the public would start to question it. Kosovo was perhaps the most selfless war though, as it did stop a genocide, but only because it was directly in our interest. All of these were because they were in our interests, not out of any benevolent, "peacekeeping" love.

So we need a larger army to do this? Extend the empire? Yes, we do need one to protect our homeland, but the army is so large today, and has been so large since WWII, that no one could even fathom a successful ground assult of the US. But that gets me to the question of Homeland Security and the war on terror.

We shouldn't be in Iraq in the first place, Yes, we are there, so we need to finish the rebuilding project. But does having a strong military really make us that much safer? Had we had a larger military pre-9/11, the only difference would have been that Al Qaeda would have a larger number of targets, closer to them. Take the USS Cole as an example. Why was it in the Persian Gulf? 'Peacekeeping,' maybe? Had it not have been there, there would have been no target so easy for Al Qaeda to attack. Having a large military would not have stopped those hijackers from getting on those planes. Having more security might, but a standing military is only good for one type of strategy, an offensive one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. the military is so stressed, we dont need more guys
sent back out to a useless police action... My point was thinking about the poor guys we are sending over there. As a woman who's main choices in husbands and companions were men of the 'Nam era, I can tell you a whole generation of american men were wounded and it breaks my heart we are doing it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. The problem is being too spread out
Adding more bases in other countries and increasing expenditures on sophisticated weaponry and prototypes (since bush has reopened the arms race so to speak) leaves military personnel, their families, and veterans with less on an individual basis. Also, once you are too spread out and engaged in more conflict globally, your military can erode no matter how strong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FDRrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. If it will mean less killing
then the whole SITUATION is in better shape then I figured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. not less killing Rock... more suicides
DN had a UPI reporter on today, he was telling the story of how badly the troops are treated. If you aren't injured bad enough to get treatment at Walter Reed you just sit for months at your "home" base or even get kicked out of the reserves with no treatment at all... It's just freaking CRIMINAL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. And they call us Un-American
Funny how even though the family was "willing to speak out" they still had to tell their story to a British news source. Bet ya anything if teh Shrub is re-elected it won't take a year for the draft to be re-instated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. a YEAR ??!!?? LMAO
they have already been rounding up "community leaders" to serve on the draft boards in major cities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. www.bushdraft.com
scream it from the rooftops
www.bushdraft.com
They took our kid, they can get yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Hi walldude!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. I've tried to compose myself
And I have failed. This really pisses me off. Those slimy bastards. Those lying cowards. I would give my left nut for five minutes in a boxing ring with that mealy mouthed AWOL sonofabitch.

Our warriors are being sold out, people. Again. We need to bring 'em home. Now. Stop spending good soldiers on a foolish and wasted purpose. We'll need them healthy and rested soon enough, I fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. expendures on the military
already equal the totals for the next 27 countries combined I believe. The problem is spreading yourself all over the globe. It can cause a society to implode when the military is this spread out and engaged in conflict. Bottom line, empires implode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. Military Families Speak Out has been screaming this to the rooftops
Edited on Sat Apr-03-04 11:30 AM by Mari333
the horror stories are out there, and Nancy Lessin, when shes not travelling around the country, tells me about them. She worked her ass off with this family in the article. They sent him back anyway. They dont care.
Its really bad, and not only was our kid sent with scoliosis of the spine, which they diagnosed him with at Ft Dix and conveniently lost his Xrays, but they are sending kids back over and over , some who have been wounded already.
The US public is blind to it, or doesnt seem to care.
http://www.bringthemhomenow.com
wheres the outrage?
I posted this story a few weeks ago as per what I heard from Nancy, when Nancy told me about it. Lets see, wheres the US media? Ignoring it, completely. I dont think a lot of people on here believed me.
Im glad it got into some news source.
Dont even ask me about the harassment my family and many other military parents and loved ones recieve when we speak out against the war. Its not a pretty story.
Fascists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bandy Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. I can't even read the whole story
because my Dad, a WWII vet suffered for the REST OF HIS LIFE til age 65 with PTSD and was never properly treated. The VA blamed it on Yellow Fever or Maleria or something to that affect. My whole childhood was about stays at the VA hospital and homecomings that eventually turned back to the VA hospital. The depression, nightmares, etc. were very real. I didn't so much understand then but now I realize just how much pain this man suffered. Wish I had known then what I know now. Maybe he would still be alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Bush cut the VA benefits by a third and the returning soldiers
Edited on Sat Apr-03-04 11:52 AM by Mari333
have to wait 3 months or more for any kind of mental health help IF they are allowed to stay here, most are sent back with severe stress and some who are wounded are sent back.
www.motherspeak.org is a site where one woman is trying to create a list of mental health professionals who will step up to the plate to help these kids.
Its an outrage, and a lot of people have been aware of it in this Iraqnam for a long time, but getting press to cover it is really hard, and a lot of families, when they do speak out in anger, are harassed and slapped down by upper echelons of the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bandy Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Am sorry to say
but I think that has been the case for as long as I can remember which is longer then I like to admit to. I spent a lot of time at the VA hospital in Richmond. I remember it well. McGuire's (sp) I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. Sugar Coating
A war is just wrong. I may be just slightly too young to comment on Vietnam, but as a young child, then early teenager, I REMEMBER DISTINCTLY seeing the dead and wounded soldiers prominently displayed on the nightly news. Reporters in flack jackets and helmets reporting, under fire, shoulder to shoulder with the troops. The news would show the funerals, the grieving parents, the returning wounded guys.

I place the blame for this squarely on the press. Yeah, I know the WH is trying to control the information coming out of Irag and Afghanistan. But, there is no excuse for the near criminal behavior by the press in their wholesale lack of reporting on this "military action." It is incompetence at its very least, blatant cowardice at its worst.

I am outraged that our troops are being sent over there to begin with. It is criminal to then under-supply them, and ignore them once they are wounded or killed as if they were a piece of meat or non-person. As long as the WH and the press can keep this "hostile takeover" dehumanized, they consider themselves safe from the angry mobs. Our men and women, sons and daughters, spouses and loved ones are being maimed and killed. It is the cruelest thing I can think of to dehumanize this in the way the WH and the press have.

To further compound my anger and fear, my son is 23, just graduated from college, can't find a job, and will probably be assigned cannon fodder status IF * is re-elected (draft). Canada is not an option any longer, CO status will face wholesale denial. We will advise him to become gay ASAP! Oh wait, let's see if they do away with Don't Ask, Don't Tell for the DRAFT!

Gotta stop - head exploding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Tell everyone about the www.bushdraft.com
They tried to take my oldest son, it took people on DU and lots of work on my part to keep him out, then they took my stepson who is in Baghdad right now, and not in good shape.
They will take anyone, they do NOT care..if Bush gets in there will be a draft, no doubt about it.
My other sons, I have 3 , all draft age, have had an escape plan ever since they took Michael. Micheal wont be returning til December.
also give this site out to all young people who think they want to enlist or are being told to go over.
www.calltoconscience.net
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC