Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Our continued occupation of Iraq is pure neo-colonialism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 04:24 AM
Original message
Our continued occupation of Iraq is pure neo-colonialism
What lessons, if any, can be learned about the failures and collapse of European colonialism from the late 19th through the mid-20th centuries that are applicable to our plight in Iraq?

I'm not aware of any nation that the European colonial powers left behind that did not go through protracted (even to this day) periods of chaos and violence.

I don't see stability in Iraq's near future, no matter how many troops we send there or how many compliant puppets we try to put into power.

It is a slow-motion melt down that we will be powerless to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. I t seems you are right but I do not know my history that well.
The countries coming out of the Iron Curtain countries seem to do better but that is a little later and some what different.Japan and Germany I do not think can be put into this at all but I do hear the GOP keep saying this as like Iraq. The armies in these countries turned their govt over to us and Germany was rebuilt, but then only half and Japan was a unit within its self of people who did what they were told. We also put in the govt and the people to run it who did as we told for 50 years.Germany was run by Eng. Fr. and Us. or the parts that worked out well and Rus. just looted their part and ruled with an iron fist. I would say what we did is more like Germany did to Poland or Austria, as it seems to me it is a take over. Fr. also comes to mind. The whole time Ger. was in Fr. they fought in the under ground to get them out and I think they lost a million men at the start of the war so it was really not just the same either. Iraq army just melted away and Fr. gave up after being really beat.It also was not the whole country. It is an interesting subject. Fir the life of me I do not see where the US got it in their minds we would be met with dancing flower people. Ever hear of that going on. Fr. did at the end of the war but how can we count that as the same?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It seems to me that among ex-colonies
very very few have done well and those that have are mostly geographically self-contained: USA, Australia, Canada. Hard to think of any others.

The Latin American colonies, especially small ones have really struggled. A handful of Carribean colonies have survived on tourism, but many are dysfunctional in the extreme. African colonies have been downright disastrous. Many of these have the problem of arbitrary borders having been drawn by the colonizing nations--often to quell political opposition.

That is clearly an issue in Iraq, where arbitrary borders divided Kurds in Iraq from Kurds in Turkey and Iran. Borders divided Shia Muslims from their own in Iran. Borders divided oil wealth among Arab families, but separated ethnic and religious groups. This is a kind of Balkanization that always seems to foment violence.

I think the future of Iraq is almost certain to be extemely unsettled and violent. The Fallujah outrage is just a small taste of more to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC