Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Bush is doomed: True or false...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 03:28 PM
Original message
Why Bush is doomed: True or false...
True or false: Barring an economic miracle that would trigger the creation of more than two million jobs in the next eighteen months, George W. Bush will end this term as the first president since Carter to oversee a net loss in employment.

Answer: false.
He'll be the first president since HERBERT HOOVER to oversee a net loss in employment.

Any other questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Then Dem voter turnout will not matter?
Answer: it will......buh bye ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. We ALL need to volunteer at our local headquarters!!! register Democrats
to vote and on election Day, all day, volunteer to drive democratic voters to the poles....all over the country in every city and town.. this will be the only we can cinch the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whoYaCallinAlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unemployment is but ONE issue.
Surely you are not suggesting that national security, health care, educations, and social security are also not important in this election are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. It would be nice to think...
Edited on Sun Aug-03-03 03:58 PM by Davis_X_Machina
...that Americans would actually vote in their economic self interest, but there are 70-100 million of them -- half of whom actually vote -- that would cheerfully volunteer to live in a cardboard box under a bridge if Junta Boy asked them, so long as Captain Codpiece promises to save them from the twin specters of peace abroad and gay marriage at home.

Since 1936, economic self-interest has never swung an American presidential election, or there would not have been a Republican elected in that span.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. WTF??????????? Davis_X_Machina
"Since 1936, economic self-interest has never swung an American presidential election, or there would not have been a Republican elected in that span."


I remember a very nice Jimmy Carter getting his a$$ handed to him by Ronnie Raygun when Ronnie asked the Am voter: "Are you better off now than you were four years ago?"

Kinda sounds to me as if he was appealing to "economic self-interest".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Iran cost Carter the election. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That was part of it
but the high interst rates, sluggish economy, long gas lines, and that very simple, yet powerful question was what put RR in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Worst economic times in the 70's and 80's, for....
ordinary folks, in terms of interest rates and unemployment, were after the election was over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Hmmmmmmmm
Edited on Sun Aug-03-03 04:24 PM by maine_raptor
Well then I must be mistaken in remembering a car loan I took out in 1978 with a 16% interest rate. Or maybe I forgot the shock of seeing gas for $1 a gal for the first time around then.


BTW: I see an image of the Great State of Maine in your post, where abouts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. Over here in the land of fortune tellers.
My husband says Bush is going to get a second term. :toast: I am toasting because my husband has never made a prediction that came true, ever.

He also said six months ago that Howard Dean would be nothing more than a blip and no one would even know his name in six months. :toast:

Let's hope his latest prediction is consistent with all his other ones. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dragonquest8 Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Saddam and Osama are captured, WMDs are found
the economy bounces back. those things could still happen in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. The econmy will never bounce back unless
they fire the economic advisors they have and rehire Clinton's. Not only that no one can bring back the American lives lost in Iraq. The increasing body bag count is what will sour even the most rabid freeper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC