Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Amendment Would Best Protect "The Sanctity of Marriage"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 05:31 PM
Original message
Poll question: What Amendment Would Best Protect "The Sanctity of Marriage"?
Edited on Thu Mar-04-04 05:32 PM by elperromagico
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GregorStocks Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Um ... The second one seems sort of pointless.
Isn't adultery already illegal?

Then again, what do I know? I'm only 13.

with a 1480 on my SATs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Gay marriage is also illegal in most states, isn't it?
So that's rather pointless too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Donating Member (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Maybe you should give a few of those points back
In any state that has a law against adultery, it is unconstitutional and no longer enforced. Except in the military where it is illegal and selectively enforced.

That is why an amendment would be needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Other- an amendment legalizing gay marriage.
Who the fuck voted for the anti gay amendment? God damn bigots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. How about the
mind your own business amendment?

or better yet, the tend to your own garden (marriage) amendment!

Or the ever popular keep your religion to yourself amendment!

or the maybe if you got laid regularly you wouldn't care what other people did in their bedrooms amendment

I could go on and on...:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. ROFL
Those are really good, the last one particularly! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Other - the 1st and 14th amendments.
Luckily, we already have them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. How 'bout just re-reading the part of the constitution that
says all rights not specifically granted to the feds are reserved to the states and let them hash it out.

Marriage isn't a federal issue, nor should it be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Too easy. Gotta complicate it a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. What, hardly anyone voted for the Anti-Reality Show Amendment
You must be a bunch of Godless Commies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karabekian Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. none at all
imo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CalebHayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. A few of those would help
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
strategery blunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm torn between the anti-adultery amendment and
anti-domestic violence amendment.

I have seen both and their destructive influence on relationships (both within one relationship!:mad: ) However, I voted for the anti-domestic violence amendment because d.v. is far more destructive, especially as children often witness it firsthand while they only hear about adultery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. If you must protect the santicty of marriage
The you must have a multi facet law that prohibts
Adultery
Divorce
Marriage unless both the man and the woman have the ability to procreate
Marriage unless counseling has been provided for 6 months prior
Marriage unless both parties are 18 or older (why let the states control when someone may get married)
Marriage if either the man or the woman has been convicted of a sexual crime.


I'm not saying that I am against these issues, but want to make sure those prejudiced holy rollers understand the full terms fo the contract they want to sign with marriage. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
strategery blunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. "Prejudiced holy rollers?"
Edited on Fri Mar-05-04 12:13 AM by chair094
I'm not a fundie. I have just seen some of these things with my own eyes and it was not pretty. And yes, I do "understand the full terms (to) the contract (...of) marriage." That is why I'm not married and won't be for a loooooooooong time. (I'm 18.)

If you had seen what I saw as a kid...well, let's just say it does things to you. And I do think marriage is not something to take lightly, but I do not appreciate the implication of being a "prejudiced holy roller."

Edit: punctuation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myopic4141 Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
16. There are no Amendments that can protect the sanctity of marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC