Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

nursing home patients lose beds /compassion? Bush FLORIDA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:40 AM
Original message
nursing home patients lose beds /compassion? Bush FLORIDA
************* this is what bush on Fl wants for the older people who have to be put in nursing homes.get sick.lose your bed...compassion republican bastards.........People of Fl.get off the couch and write to bush and tell him and his fellow sucking off the poor and giving the rich tax cuts ...their is no way this should be allowed to happen!!!
:puke:


A Bush Medicaid cut could leave nursing home patients who have to be hospitalized.




Currently, residents can be hospitalized up to eight days and Medicaid will pay the nursing home to keep their beds open. After their hospital treatment, residents return to their corkboards and wall prints.

Medicaid calls this the "eight-day bed-hold." Bush proposes saving $23-million this year by eliminating it. In dollar terms, the bed-hold proposal pales beside a total of $300-million Bush hopes to cut from this year's nursing home budget. Florida spends more than $2-billion each year on nursing home care through Medicaid.

snip

Bush's budget reflects his determination to tame Medicaid costs anywhere he can. A federal-state health program designed for the poor, Medicaid covers children without insurance, disabled people and frail elders. But its price has doubled in six years, driven mostly by drug and nursing home costs. Medicaid now consumes one-quarter of Florida's budget, the largest single expense.



"It's a problem we have to deal with," Bush said last week. "We can't just sit back and allow the budget to grow by 12 or 15 per cent."

snip

Besides the eight-day bed-hold, Bush hopes to cut $260-million from the nursing home budget by suspending payments for staffing increases mandated by the 2002 Legislature.

snip

That's because Medicaid reimburses nursing homes based on the previous year's costs. To comply with that 2002 law, the industry already will have spent the $200-million by the time the new budget goes into effect. Reneging on reimbursement may put Bush on a collision course with some lawmakers, who undoubtedly will be pressured by local nursing home operators to maintain that funding.


snip



The Bush budget cuts would cost the average nursing home more than $400,000. Administrators said they will have to cut food service, activities, housekeeping and maintenance.


To qualify for bed-hold money, a nursing home must have filled at least 80 percent of its beds in the previous quarter. That means the bed-hold cut would fall hardest on residents of the most popular homes. Bon Secours, where Grace Potaski lives, often has a waiting list.

snip

On Day 10, Bon Secours' admissions office called Jo Ann Drysdale, Potaski's daughter.

"The lady said, "I hate this part of my job, but I have to tell you that Medicaid only holds beds for eight days,' " Drysdale recalled.

The nursing home would keep the bed open if Potaski's family would pay the $146-a-day charge. Drysdale and her husband are both disabled.

"I said I couldn't afford that," Drysdale said. "They said they would have to pack up her belongings and put them in storage."

Good fortune intervened. When the hospital released Potaski three days later, her bed had not been filled.

Without Medicaid's bed-hold money, such uncertainties will become common, said Bon Secours social worker Nancy Reinthaler. It would also aggravate another phenomenon:

"We have people who simply refuse to go to the hospital for fear they won't get their bed back."

- Staff writer Joni James contributed to this report.

© Copyright 2003 St. Petersburg Times. All rights reserved


http://www.sptimes.com/2004/03/01/news_pf/State/Patients_may_lose_che.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. why don't we just kill off everyone over 60?
immediate savings on drugs, hospitalization, social security

lots of jobs immediately available

Oops - I forgot, that's the tacit goal of all the tax cuts and resulting social program cuts at the fed and state level

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC