Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AWOL accusations are too murky to catch on but refusing an order

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 12:45 PM
Original message
AWOL accusations are too murky to catch on but refusing an order
to take a Flight Physical after hundreds of thousands of dollars (1970 dollars) spent on training is easy to verify and impossible to justify. Remember it was a Mandatory Physical and Bush* just blew it off with no reason given. This one is a slam dunk. We have the documentation. Bush* was grounded for refusing to take a mandatory physical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. And the commanding officers who let him slide?
Shouldn't they be dealt with, too? (Even the dead ones, IMHO.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryYoungMan Donating Member (856 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not too murky!
They are, actually, catching on. People will make up their minds about this one the way they did about Whitewater; not based on a "gotcha" document but based on a general sense of what Bush did or did not do, which has already emerged. (IMHO)

Notice that they're not even trying to defend Bush's hiding from combat; that's a given. Rove etc. must have said, "We cannot fight the clear truth that he used influence to hide from the war; we've lost that one already. We have to focus on damage control vis-a-vis these records." And even that's not going well.

It's not murky; it's plenty clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I hope it is raising some eyebrows but the fact remains that they are
making it very murky at the present. What with several people saying they remember Bush* showed up and some pay records showing he received pay for that period and another story saying National Guard Records are notorious for being lost and misplaced and yadda yadda yadda but we have concrete solid evidence that he was grounded for refusing an order to take a Mandatory Flight Physical. That means that every penny spent in training him was wasted because Bush* Quit Why did he refuse his physical and allow all his training to be for naught? That is the question we need to be asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NWHarkness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. The details are not what will make a difference
The important thing about the AWOL issue finally surfacing is that it shatters Bush's facade of honesty and good character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. The real kicker will be the cleansing of the records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's what I'm hammering, Bandit!
The missed flight physical is the crux of Lt. Bush’s problems with his guard service. Why would TANG want him back in the unit if he were not qualified to fly? Why would AANG take him, even into a non-flying billet, given that he had, de facto, disobeyed an order to take a flight physical? Submission to the annual flight physical, required of all pilots operating under the auspices and regulations of the air force (as was TANG), was not an option; it was a mandate. In July 1972, by skipping his flight physical, Lt. Bush also failed to comply with new USAF regulations concerning mandatory drug testing. USAF regulations are not bent or broken without serious consequences, for most people. All other issues regarding Lt. George W. Bush’s service record in the Air National Guard derive from the missed flight physical. Expect the self-proclaimed “war president,” Mr. Bush, to get hammered on this in the months to come. Meanwhile, don’t look for any campaign ads on TV with Bush doing his “fighter-pilot-strut” on the flight deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You think there won't be an opposition ad
of flightsuit bush landing and then standing in front of Mission Accomplished
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. hey......great post, as usual.....but the DEMS should use the landing
Edited on Mon Feb-16-04 02:26 PM by buycitgo
on the carrier themselves......

I said that the other day

it's so obvious

eric blumrich did a great take on this

pulling it up now

edit/////

here it is

http://www.ericblumrich.com/topgun.html

pretty disturbing/sad, as I recall....haven't watched in awhile, and it takes forever to load on my hamster-driven machine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Absolutely! My mistake on that one.
I can't wait, either!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Why Bush stopped flying remains a mystery" USA Today
USA Today of all places. . . .

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-02-15-bush-record_x.htm

<snip>

Why 1st Lt. Bush stopped flying F-102 fighters remains murky despite the release on Friday of more than 400 pages of records detailing his Guard service from the time he enlisted until he was discharged.

<snip>

After Bush stopped flying fighter jets in April 1972 and did not take an annual physical examination required of all pilots, the Air Force should have required a hearing known as a flying evaluation board to determine his fitness to fly. Because the federal government spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to train each pilot, it typically did not allow them to stop flying without a formal proceeding. Bush's records do not mention a flying evaluation board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Flying Evaluation Board!
how appropos!

FEB for Feb!

first time I've heard anything about that.

when is this going to be hammered

hey DEMS!

HEY TERRY!

here's your chance to hit a home run on all those shows

this simple item encapsulates dumbo's dilemma

it crystalizes the shirking, the evasions, the diversions.

they can't elide their way around this.

MAKE them answer this.....keep them on the defensive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. "DNIF"
Edited on Mon Feb-16-04 02:34 PM by DemoTex
Pilots who stop flying are given other Guard duties. In Air Force jargon, it's called DNIF, or Duties Not to Include Flying, which is a written order.

We called DNIF, and I kid you not, Drunk Not Interested in Flying. DNIF was a hilarious joke to us. Especially in the 'Nam, where you were expected to buck-up and fly sick (certain ailments excluded, of course).

On edit to clarify: DNIF was usually a result of sick call. A pilot with an ear infection could not fly, but could help the armory officer inventory the arms room. Usually, DNIF was a pass to stay at home and do nothing except recuperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. how does this tie in with the ARF detail?
also, somebody on another AWOL thread mentioned IRR, IRI, or something like that, in which guard members could force the issue of getting the kind of duty they wanted......don't remember details

know anything about that?

couldn't find anything on google
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Very important point. Let me post the whole paragraph from USA Today:
Pilots who stop flying are given other Guard duties. In Air Force jargon, it's called DNIF, or Duties Not to Include Flying, which is a written order. There is no indication in Bush's records that his supervisors assigned him another job. Aides say Bush has told them that once he stopped flying, he performed "odds and ends" for commanders whose names he can't recall.

The paragraph should read: Pilots who are required to stop flying for valid reasons ...

DNIF is NOT available to a pilot who just quits flying, on his/her own. If Bu$h failed the flight physical, he would have been DNIF. Bush, however, failed to take his required flight physical. Additionally, mandatory drug test were required of ALL service personnel. Until that drug test was accomplished (clean), no commander could legally use Bush for any duty.

Active duty officers in Bush's situation would probably have been given a couple of weeks to comply with all the outstanding medical requirements before facing UCMJ proceedings. Guard officers probably had a little more time before the book was thrown at them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. so, logically this leads to the assumption
that something more should be in his record to account for what happened as a result of this failure, right?

what should that have been, and how to get the fricking MEDIA to pursue this avenue

this clearly means that there are more missing records, yes?

and what about his failure to become captain?

and what about the lack of evaluation reports following the fatuously fawning ones the media were only too happy to shout from the rooftops?

and what about his DISCIPLINARY record?

was that released at all?

does one appear if there were never any sanctions at all?

where's HIS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. just reread your post...good catch on the 'required' bit
you just have to read EVERY word that comes out about, or FROM, these pricks, as if you were Clarence Darrow, don't you?

they LIVE by elision, parsing, obfuscation

they make WJC look like a rank amateur

having the media on their side makes it just that more difficult

can't tell you how much I appreciate your diligence

you should get in touch with Marty Heldt or Capt. Rogers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. REMF
My favorite acronym was REMF: short for Rear Echelon Mother Fucker to describe the "soldiers" who avoided the front lines in Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I wouldn't use the word avoided
They did not pick their assignments. If a person's job was to be a supply clerk that is what he did. It isn't as if they chose those jobs to avoid combat. No more than a mechanic did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Whoop there it is.....
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Bu$h story is #3 most emailed link for today in USA Today at 3pm EST.
View the most EMAILED links for today from USA TODAY:

1. USATODAY.com - 300 people fall ill on Carnival cruise
2. USATODAY.com - The day in pictures
3. USATODAY.com - Why Bush stopped flying remains a mystery

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. What are the possible consequences & statute of limitations?
what charges could be brought & who would bring them ?

Is there any time limit for taking action on his refusing the order ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. Bush* reason for missing medical - "there was no reason to take it"
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/14/politics/14BUSH.html?pagewanted=2

"The records show that Mr. Bush was suspended from flying beginning Aug. 1, 1972 because he failed to take the exam. His last flight exam was on May 15, 1971.

Mr. Bartlett said Mr. Bush missed the exam because he felt there was no reason to take it. Mr. Bush, he said, had begun his training in 1968 with the Air National Guard in Texas, where he flew a fighter jet, the F-102. When he moved to Alabama in 1972 to work in the Senate campaign of a friend of his father, Mr. Bush transferred to an Alabama unit of the Guard that did not fly the same plane. Because there was no way Mr. Bush could fly planes in Alabama, Mr. Bartlett said, he did not bother to report for the medical exam. "

Since when do individual service members get to decide which orders are needed and which are not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. WTF????? where's the fricking MEDIA????????????
that quote is right up there with the Deamscream!

this deserves a thread of its very own
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. My thoughts exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. Exactly
And its not just that he did not follow orders.

Its his explanation that appalls me.

He didn't feel the medical exam was necessary.

Fuck him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC