Rush Did Not Get Shot: BUT THE 9/11 REPORT IS HERE!

[snooper2]

My 9/11 report thread DIED again so I was wondering why nobody finds this worthy to discuss and talk about? Bush was blocking this thing for 7 months and now we have it finally and nobody has interest?

The report
http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/911rpt/911report72403.pdf

Some posts from the other thread that quickly DIED:
bpilgrim (1000+ posts)
here's an html version...
http://news.globalfreepress.com/911/fullreport/pages/001.shtml

"RedSock (1000+ posts)
I printed it out at work and am reading it now. Every American should read it. Here are a couple of doozies:

"Of particular interest to the Joint Inquiry was whether and to what extent the President received threat-specific warnings during this period. Access to this information was denied the Joint Inquiry by the White House." pp. 215-216"
"Contrary to what Rice said on May 16, 2002, "the Joint Inquiry confirmed that, before September 11, the Intelligence Community produced at least twelve reports over a seven-year period suggesting that terrorists might use airplanes as weapons." p. 219

[papau]

1. Thanks for the reminder - emails will be sent tonight!

:-)

[ibegurpard]

2. Worthy topic or not

I'm starting to get a little tired of people posting stuff with a "sensational" headline that has NOTHING to do with the thread itself.

:spank:

[snooper2]

5. It was my first time so...

BLAH....

READ THE REPORT!

[leftyandproud]

3. you are cruel *NT*

[Jacobin]

4. Post titles like this one piss me off

[StopTheMorans]

9. me too

like people who keep kicking their own threads. Nothing personal, but people choose which threads they like to read, and beating them over the head with something doesn't help IMHO:)

[robbedvoter]

6. HOAX - all the guns are owned by dittoheads. Only liberal DJ

get shot - and I refuse to be manipulated this way.

[LEFTofLEFT]

7. Too good to be true -

I hate feeling so angry at the right wing asses.

[bearfartinthewoods]

8. well...we know you have lied, so why should we bother

you lied in your title to get attention. why should we trust anything you say. you may be lying again, to get attention.

[snooper2]

10. You shouldn't trust anything you read on a damn poster board...

Without independent verification. For all you know I can be a escaped loon in Amsterdam smoking crack at an internet terminal...

But none of that matters...
The report does, Are you Reading It?

[gratuitous]

11. I can see the negative column now

"The folks at Democratic Underground fantasize about Rush Limbaugh being shot on the air! They're heartless! They're shameless! They're absolutely typical of all Democrats, Greens, Liberals and anyone else who disagrees with Rush politically, and wouldn't hesitate to use violence to further their Stalinist agenda!"

So thanks very much, Snooper2. I for one look forward to dealing with the slime the subject line of your post will engender.

[Skinner]

12. I'm locking this thread.

I am certainly aware that we have no rule about the appropriateness of thread titles in the General Discussion forum. However, I think that as a matter of courtesy there should be a minimal correlation between the topic of a thread and the title.

You may re-post with a more appropriate title.

Skinner
DU Admin