Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Privatizing the Space program: The Right Wing Agenda (surreal)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:15 PM
Original message
Privatizing the Space program: The Right Wing Agenda (surreal)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buffler Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I kind of agree
I think private individuals and private interests should be allowed to engage in space travel if they so choose and finance it with their own, or investors money.

Does this mean that NASA should be privatized? No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Therein lies the problem.
They don't want to raise their own funds. They want to raid the taxpayer's government money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Actually, they're not getting any
The private space ventures only get money like any other business startup if they qualify. They get NO federal money that would otherwise go to NASA and that is as it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. That's a relief to know, however, I am sure BushCo. will
change that. The fact that it was mentioned that a new Moon program would cost billions of dollars a year tells me that this is the direction they are heading in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. they've privatized the WH
why not the space industry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bush Is On The Right Side (gasp!!!)
Edited on Fri Jan-09-04 03:24 PM by economic justice
Maybe it's because he's from NASA's home state....but for whatever reason.....Bush is actually (surprise!) on the right side of this debate. He is preparing a major NASA funding proposal that the people in Houston are ecstatic about. The far right are all supporting these independent private ventures. I just read that one of them is announcing today a new training, launch,and landing facility in Oklahoma. These are fine with me (there's no stopping them anyway) as long as NASA continues to get the big bucks. For once, Bush is right in funding NASA for new research, experimentation and space travel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Buying Florida? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir_Shrek Donating Member (340 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't find too much wrong with that...
The government isn't the most progressive entity on the planet in a lot of ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. That freeper link is pretty darned funny.
The 4th reply calls CATO communist. Fucking freepers call anyone who disagrees with Bush a commie. I really don't think they have any idea what a communist, libertarian, liberal, or conservative is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Still that Communist thing?
That is amusing. Bad enough the commie label was applied back when there were communists in power somewhere in the world. I guess it's just their way of calling someone a jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Cato is libertarian free market <eom>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. LOL
Edited on Fri Jan-09-04 03:43 PM by dymaxia
...how much more un-'commie' can you get than Cato?

Maybe it's because the Cato people smoke too much pot and watch too much porn.

ON EDIT: I went to the page and read the Cato = Communist part, and I'm convinced that the person is engaging in disinformation hijinks. It's just too funny.

Their Party Line is too consonant with the same objectives of the Chinese Communist Party. At this point, I regard the CATO group as an even larger threat than the Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Endowment, and the other leftwing-subverted entities. The reason? Some legitimate conservatives are still suckered in by the CATO communists who craftily maintain their 'cover'.

That said, the CATO piece itself is pretty nutty. "Space tourism"?? This isn't the Jetsons. Ain't much to see out there, either, but maybe after the environment is trashed by the free marketeers, it will be the only place to go. Which would be sad for us but hilarious karma for them. Just try getting a suntan on Pluto.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Read this DU thread...
and ask yourself what prompted Bush's sudden interest in the space program:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=998949
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Let's hope that's not the case
I can see why we all might jump to that conclusion. PNAC wants money for a militarized space program, so naturally if Bush wants to increase space funding it must be because of PNAC. Right? Well, not really. Bush's ties to NASA go wayyyy back and he has many friends in Houston. His dad wasn't as big on NASA, but honestly, we can bash Bush on everything else (with full force) but I honestly think he's a supporter of NASA's mission of space *exploration* and doesn't support privatizing space or letting NASA dollars go to what PNAC wants. His announcement next week would indicate the people in Houston won this round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. good points
I think some folk see PNAC everywhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. conservatives and space
I think conservatives are really divided over the space program. Fiscal conservatives think it's a waste of money.

It's becoming clearer to me that the neo-cons are not free market at all, but they will ride the free market / privatization line as long as it helps them. What they really want is for the state to sponsor their own ideology to the exclusion of all others. This appears to be their real policy on the arts & education.

Which makes them very much like.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. The CATO Communists...LOL
Seriously, that article is freaky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC