Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rich kids go to college, poor ones to Baghdad

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 08:46 AM
Original message
Rich kids go to college, poor ones to Baghdad
http://www.newstatesman.com/site.php3?newTemplate=NSArticle_NS&newDisplayURN=200412060007

~snip~

You're a 14-year-old high school student in the United States, and it's time to choose your electives for the next academic year. What catches your eye? History, music, physical education- or how about the Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps (JROTC)? The programme, partly funded by the US military, and taught by retired armed forces personnel, is styled as an improving educational experience, and couched in the jargon of personal development. Its purported aim is to "motivate young people to be better citizens", and on the curriculum are communication skills, leadership, physical fitness, history and citizenship, as well as drug abuse prevention. It also involves military drills with real and dummy firearms, and marksmanship training. (Funding for some of these programmes comes from an obvious source: in late 2003, the JROTC at Channelview High School, near Houston, Texas, received a $14,000 grant from the Friends of the National Rifle Association.)

JROTC, which has a membership of 470,000 high school students, is widely seen as a thinly disguised recruitment programme for the military. More serious concerns, however, are about the way JROTC, and similar schemes such as the National Guard Leadership Education programme, target children at public (state) schools in poor areas. In early 2003, the chief executive of the School District of Philadelphia, Paul Vallas, announced plans for a free-standing military high school and an increase in the number of JROTC programmes in schools across the city from eight to 22. John Grant, president of the Philadelphia chapter of Veterans for Peace, led the protest against the plan: "The idea of moving military education down the schools gets pretty spooky to me. It's not literally a tool of recruitment. But it is a tool of indoctrination. I would like these kids to have more options, like college."

As in Philadelphia, public schools in Chicago are filled overwhelmingly with poor, non-white students. Of the latter's 93 high schools, 44 run a JROTC programme. And even the 11-14 age group gets military influence: 20 of Chicago's middle schools offer Cadet Corps, a modified version of JROTC. This is not to mention the seven military academies that operate as "schools within schools" in Chicago. Before 2002, there was a cap of 3,500 on JROTC programmes; in 2002, this cap was removed by the Defence Authorisation Act.

~snip~

The Bush administration signed the No Child Left Behind Act in January 2002 - which it hailed as an important social initiative. In the small print is a provision that threatens the withdrawal of federal funding from any high school which refuses to provide students' details to military recruiters. Section 9528, Armed Forces Recruiter Access to Students and Student Recruiting Information, enables the military to make unsolicited contact with children as young as 11.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Put them on the armed forces track early, its the only option kept open nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. I thought the Newstatesman was an opinion newspaper
and therefore not LBN. Am I mistaken?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. It's been moved.
But not deleted, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prayin4rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. That is so sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:00 AM
Original message
And now that financial aid opportunities
Have been reduced, we'll see more kids going into the military thinking it's their only option to pay for college, only to die before they make it to the halls of academia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good article
Not LBN however
9 It's a feature, magazine style article. Notice the date is Dec 6th)
Will move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. I guess 51% of Americans want this for the nation's young people
well, then theirs better be going to die too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dummy-du1 Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. I wonder, somewhere I heard that before...
Edited on Thu Dec-02-04 10:07 AM by dummy-du1
ENLIST NOW!

Proud YOUNG PEOPLE in uniform, the bloom of human evolution.

Citizenship now guaranteed to all able applicants.
Put your plans on hold to fight for the future!
Protect your continued right to evolve!

Would you like to know more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC