Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Gadhafi Is Facing a Coalition of the Unwilling'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 06:06 PM
Original message
'Gadhafi Is Facing a Coalition of the Unwilling'
The coalition military operation against Moammar Gadhafi has made good progress toward its goals of destroying the Libyan dictator's air defenses and establishing a no-fly zone over the country. But that, it seems, was the easy part. Far more difficult are the questions of who should now lead the mission and what the operation's ultimate objectives should be.

The US government, wary of getting stuck in another war in a Muslim country, would like to hand control of the mission over to NATO, but the alliance is divided. At a meeting on Monday, NATO ambassadors failed to agree on whether the alliance should take control of the mission. NATO involvement would require approval by all 28 members.

France has opposed handing control to NATO because of Arab skepticism about the alliance, which is perceived as being dominated by the US. Paris would prefer the current coalition of France, Britain and the US to keep political control of the mission, with operational support from NATO, according to sources quoted by Reuters. Turkey, an alliance member which sees itself as a bridge to the Muslim world, is opposing NATO control of the operation. On Tuesday, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said that the United Nations should be in charge of an entirely humanitarian operation in Libya.

Britain and Italy want the alliance to be in charge of the operation, however. Rome has threatened to restrict access to its air bases, which are crucial to the mission, if NATO does not take over control. US Defense Secretary Robert Gates has suggested that Britain or France could also take control of the mission, but some NATO officials doubt if either country could handle the operation by itself, according to Reuters.

MORE...

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,752521,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess maybe the Bush admin.* had the right idea BUYING a coalition. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. typical. No clue what the ultimated objectives should be.
They are bombing Libya, and don't even know what they are trying to achieve with the bombing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cieran_WI Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Oh, they know. Protecting BP's many billions of $ of investments
But as to what the PUBLIC objective should be for their media propaganda campaign against the West, they are still unsure about how to spin it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The mission is to protect the civilian populace
As Obama said on the day it began, with an ultimatum to Gadhafi, the Libyan military needed to pull back from rebel-held cities, including Benghazi and Misrata and cease air attacks.

I hope it doesn't go on much longer ,as far as our involvement, and it looks to be successful so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC