Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gulf seafood safe to eat, FDA says Just like Ground Zero was safe right after 9-11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-10 02:31 AM
Original message
Gulf seafood safe to eat, FDA says Just like Ground Zero was safe right after 9-11
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-fi-fda-seafood-20101029,0,2608868.story


Officials report that less than 1% of 1,735 seafood tissue samples came up positive for any trace chemicals and that those samples that tested positive contained levels of contaminants well below the safety threshold. Recent chemical tests have shown no widespread contamination to seafood from dispersants used to break up oil from the BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico — and that such food is safe for the public to eat.

Officials from the federal Food and Drug Administration and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported Friday that less than 1% of 1,735 seafood tissue samples tested came up positive for any trace chemicals. Those samples that tested positive contained levels of contaminants well below the safety threshold of 100 parts per million for fish and 500 parts per million for shrimp, crabs and oysters, federal officials said. "This new test should help strengthen consumer confidence in gulf seafood," FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg said in a statement. "The overwhelming majority of the seafood tested shows no detectable residue, and not one of the samples shows a residue level that would be harmful for humans. There is no question gulf seafood coming to market is safe from oil or dispersant residue."

The samples, collected from June to September, were drawn from a wide variety of fish species — including tuna, wahoo, swordfish, gray snapper and butterfish — and shellfish including shrimp, crabs and oysters. The chemical test was focused on finding dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, or DOSS, a key compound used in the dispersant.




Contrast that with this report on youtube

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x520600

BP/P2S Worker Demands Answers from Claims Csar Kenneth Feinberg

On The Eve Of His First Organized Protest, Former BP/P2S Employee Turned Activist Tosh Peters Demands Answers From Oil Spill Claims Csar Kenneth Feinberg As To Why All Claims By BP/P2S Employees Are Being Rejected When Temporary And Migrant Workers Are Being Paid. Peters Also Discusses Seafood Safety And The Cleanup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-10 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good title for your post
These lies are breeding the lack of trust that is turning this country inside out.
I doesn't even matter when it is health and safety is on the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-10 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. i want to see THEM sit down with THEIR FAMILIES and eat the gulf coast
seafood they say is safe. Show us how safe it is you bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-10 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Lies, lies and more lies...
Who believes them any more?

Who cares what they say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-10 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah and the FDA had no problems with the contaminated eggs,
spinach and ground beef right up until the time people started getting sick. And they still have no problem with all that mercury in your cans of tuna fish.

The RepubliCONS have certainly destroyed all trust in government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-10 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Does Government approval protect seafood harvesters from liability?
Edited on Sat Oct-30-10 07:45 AM by no_hypocrisy
If the FDA says Gulf seafood is "safe", but later it's found to have profound and dangerous effects on consumers, does the original agency go-ahead protect the fishermen from being sued?

BTW, take a gander at this sample of Gulf seafood:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9418763
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-10 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. They have totally discredited themselves nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC