Maybe Members of Congress Want to Cut Unemployment Benefits to Increase Unemployment

[roxiejules]

Dean Baker:

The Post yet again tells us that members of Congress are political philosopohers, telling readers that: "Congress's inaction has been accompanied by a growing sentiment among lawmakers that long-term unemployment benefits create a disincentive for the jobless to find work."

How does the Post know what sentiments members of Congress have? Furthermore is there any reason to believe that their sentiments explain their votes on important issues?

Members of Congress get elected and re-elected by getting the support of powerful interest groups, not on their abilities as political philosophers. While the opponents of extending unemployment benefits may believe that they are bad policy, this is likely less relevent to the their votes than the political considerations behind this vote.

At the moment, the Republicans appear to have adopted a strategy of blocking anything that President Obama tries to do, with the idea that a bad economy will be good for them on Election Day. While the Post may not want to assert in a news story that this is the explanation for their opposition to extending unemployment benefits, it is certainly inappropriate to provide an alternative explanation for which it has zero evidence.

http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/maybe-members-of-congress-want-to-cut-unemployment-benefits-to-increase-unemployment?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+beat_the_press+%28Beat+the+Press%29

[Birthmark]

1. Sure.

Many is the person who stays home to feast on the lucrative unemployment benefits.

These fucking people are from another planet. It's the only explanation.